Page 561 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

Josephine
On Mon,
Dec 2, 2013
at 2:57 PM,
Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Josey
I tried to call you today re Simon case not sure if you got the below email so I will send this again
over to you. There are some points I really do not understand and until the crown gives us information
as to this it does seem to me that Simon case at court has the claim for
Feb 2013
case in it as they are not giving a list of what was taken.
1. Both the invoices from Li-Lo Leisure products ltd that have been given for Simon Case in
May 2013
and the information that the crown has just given you are the same.
346,
2. On the invoices the address that the items in the invoice was not delivered to the address the parties
were held in, in
Feb 2013
and also
May 2013
they were delivered to Marks wholesale which is a big shop, so how did they get to the address the
parties were held in I am sure Marks wholesale would have storage space and it does seem very funny
that they would move items that were ordered to sell at one of his large shops?
3. There has never been a list of items that Mr petal said was taken in May just an invoice so is Mr
Petal saying that all the items on the list was taken at the party in
May 2013
4. So far, we do not even know the list of items that were taken in
Feb 2013
and seeing at Mr petal seems to be using the same invoice for both dates there should be 2 lists of
items that were taken
5. what was the cost of the damage to the building in
Feb 2013
as it seems from the emails Mr Petal has listed from his insurance, they have put both claims into one
which in fact would then go over to the date Simon hired his sound system out in
May 2013-12-02
6. Why did the insurance company does not pay the
Feb 2013
claim out till after the claim in
May 2013?
Why did they only pay out after the?
May 2013
claim is it due that someone was arrested, and they could put both claims over to the court case of
Simon. As if you look at the dates of the insurance part it does not make any sense as the last date
shows
April 2013
yet it says they are paying out both claims, how could they pay out both claims when the party in May
had not even happened yet. Or is it the case there was a next party after
Feb 2013
and before
May 2013
7. What was the costs of damage to the building in
Feb 2013
and the value of the items taken.
8. What was the damage to the building in
May 2013