Page 562 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 562
and the value of the items taken. In short how could the property have been stolen in
May 2013
if it had already been stolen in
Feb 2013
as the invoice is the same? Also, the damage to the building from
Feb 2013
seems to have been added to the costs to the
May 2013
but yet Simon has not been charged with the party in
Feb 2013
It seems they have mixed both cases together and Simon is taking the blame for all of it within the
costs. The Crown does need to give us all the information to the
Feb 2013
case including pictures so we can see ourselves the damage to the building and they need to tell us if
anyone was changed in
Feb 2013
and what was the outcome. If the crown does not do this then this is an unfair trail they will be
holding as to Simon case. Also, we need to see all the insurance claims to see the total costs of
damage in
Feb 2013
and also, for the claim in
May 2013
and the reasons as to why both cases have been linked together by the insurance company. Also,
where is the insurance claim for the items within the warehouse that was meant to have been taken as
so far, I can only see a claim for the damage to the building?
Any claim would need to include a list of the items that were taken and would need to be replaced.
Someone cannot just come up with a figure of a cost for items that were taken and so far, it seems as
if that has what has been done in both cases
Feb 2013
And
May 2013
347,
Lorraine / Simon
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 28 November 2013 19:54
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: CPS response to secondary disclosure and confirmation of conference
Hi Josey
Thank you for the email I just got it so will let Simon look over this tomorrow. Can I ask something
the receipt from Li-Lo Leisure is that the receipt for the?
16/02/2013
or the
04/05/2013
as it seems to be the same receipt. What we want is a full list of items and amounts that were taken on
the
04/05/2013
and also, the same for the
16/02/2013
someone can’t say an amount in £s of damage and items were taken yet not have a full list, or are they
saying on each of the receipts for the
04/05/2013
and the
16/02/2013
all of the items listed on the receipts were taken it does not make sense as they seem to be the same
receipts. There are also no invoices for the repair of the damage on the