Page 562 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 562

and the value of the items taken. In short how could the property have been stolen in
               May 2013
               if it had already been stolen in
               Feb 2013
               as the invoice is the same? Also, the damage to the building from
               Feb 2013
               seems to have been added to the costs to the
               May 2013
               but yet Simon has not been charged with the party in
               Feb 2013
               It seems they have mixed both cases together and Simon is taking the blame for all of it within the
               costs. The Crown does need to give us all the information to the
               Feb 2013
               case including pictures so we can see ourselves the damage to the building and they need to tell us if
               anyone was changed in
               Feb 2013
               and what was the outcome. If the crown does not do this then this is an unfair trail they will be
               holding as to Simon case. Also, we need to see all the insurance claims to see the total costs of
               damage in
               Feb 2013
               and also, for the claim in
               May 2013
               and the reasons as to why both cases have been linked together by the insurance company. Also,
               where is the insurance claim for the items within the warehouse that was meant to have been taken as
               so far, I can only see a claim for the damage to the building?
               Any claim would need to include a list of the items that were taken and would need to be replaced.
               Someone cannot just come up with a figure of a cost for items that were taken and so far, it seems as
               if that has what has been done in both cases
               Feb 2013
               And
               May 2013
               347,
               Lorraine / Simon
               From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 28 November 2013 19:54
               To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
               Subject: RE: CPS response to secondary disclosure and confirmation of conference
               Hi Josey
               Thank you for the email I just got it so will let Simon look over this tomorrow. Can I ask something
               the receipt from Li-Lo Leisure is that the receipt for the?
               16/02/2013
               or the
               04/05/2013
               as it seems to be the same receipt. What we want is a full list of items and amounts that were taken on
               the
               04/05/2013
               and also, the same for the
               16/02/2013
               someone can’t say an amount in £s of damage and items were taken yet not have a full list, or are they
               saying on each of the receipts for the
               04/05/2013
               and the
               16/02/2013
               all of the items listed on the receipts were taken it does not make sense as they seem to be the same
               receipts. There are also no invoices for the repair of the damage on the
   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567