Page 563 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

16/02/2013
or the
04/05/2013
for someone to come up with the amounts that they have for the damages to this so-called building on
the
04/05/2013
Which he would have had to get invoices for his insurance companies. Also, there is no information
as to really anything for the
16/02/2013
And no information as to the people that were arrested and what happened to them. There is also
nothing to show any work was carried out on the building from
16/02/2013
so, show anything was fixed as I am sure there should have been. There is far too much data that is
missing. And I wonder why how can a police officer not have any full lists of items that were taken
yet be able to have a total amount of damage that were caused how could they come to these sums?
There seems to me a lot in this case is being covered up by the police and I would like this addressed
as how can someone have a fair tail without the full facts.
Lorraine
348,
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 November 2013 17:30
To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell
Subject: CPS response to secondary disclosure and confirmation of conference
Dear Simon / Lorraine
Please see the CPS response to our defence case statement. This was received in the DX today. It does
not advance our case. I am also confirming that your barrister can only do a conference On
12th December 2013
at 10am at Nexus Chambers. He has personal appointments tomorrow and cannot as previously
advised to a conference at Croydon Crown Court. I have therefore booked a fixed conference for
12th December 2013
at 10am at Nexus Chambers so that he will not be caught up in a trial and there is no risk of you
breaching your curfew. Before that date I would also like to finalise your proof of evidence and I
would hope to do that
Tuesday
afternoon or the following
Monday.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further questions regarding this case.
Regards
Josephine

14
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
150. Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn
Metropolitan Police Service
Directorate of Professional Standards
/ Page Numbers: 349,
From: Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 11 December 2013 12:44
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Public complaint by your son Simon Cordell
Ms Cordell,
I tried to call you today to ask you a question about your son's complaint. I was unable to get hold of
you. Please can you reply and let me know if your son is disputing his penalty notice or not. If he has
requested a Court hearing (which his complaint would tend to indicate) the complaint will be classed
as 'subjudice' Which means it will be put on hold until Court proceedings are complete.