Page 1032 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Witness Pc Edgoose — R.O 12:14pm EIC Read
Statement 21
Incident of 24th July:
I was in a vehicle that stopped D’s Vehicle.
No threat to break defendant’s window (ok)
It was all about drug issues.
Witness VI—Pc King 12:28pm EIC
Tab 15/16
R V CORDELL- 3rd Statement Page 41
Officer has only met D once before.
D has always been polite.
Officer has had no problem with the defendant.
D rely eloquent of clearly knows the how.
Witness Pc Ames—Acting sergeant—R. O -12:46 Pm
EIC
DEF XEX
Event was outdoors.
Saw sound equipment substance speakers’ box.
Approximately, the size of the witness box, but could not
remember really, as he got distracted by other people.
No further questions.
Witness—Pc Elsmore—R. O—14:10 EIC
Tab 6—pg. DEF XEX
COUNSEL:
The officer got confused that of the PNC info about the
statements and it adds no probative value of info Re:
Witness being “afraid of D” Which he puts down to the
way he worded, but he meant that people actually, gets
afraid off possibly, giving evidence in court.
COUNSEL:
Counsel argues that the officer's statement got designed to
cause on evidence reaction of this of no value and
speculator in nature.
DJ.
How many calls from the public did the police receive?
COUNSEL:
Witness are in excess of 15 calls—how many to the same
venue and no other address.
Officer does not know the number of callers in relation to
each of these occasions.
On page 15—Allegations re: Mill Marsh Lane, evidence
from an officer not first-hand—relied on cads and other
Intel.
Query Re:” 3 massive nitrous tanks.
DJ:
Where did you get such info officer?
Witness
2454,
Witness