Page 1034 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

On that particular, re post, it appears to be right.
I did not speak to Parcel, he got forced @ 7 boroughs.
I believe he never got included in the email because Intel
(text missing) Email sent to LDE only.
Searched (text missing) for info on Cordell’s convections.
Counsel:
Moving on to statement on Page 30.
Does the PO investigating unit have more info than it is
letting on?
Officer:
No!
Counsel:
Are you aware that Miss Cordell has spoken to other
officers Re: Rave?
Suggests that you do not want DS Tanner to get examined
on these proceedings because she has information: Re
knowledge of raves and them not being connected to
W/D.
I Spoke to PC Tanner, but I did not write what we spoke
about down to (text missing) this year.
You have no recorded that you emailed her, but then
spoken to her.
The Emails have gotten deleted, and no copies get kept
on the police records of them.
Met police: XEX OF Witness vii
Done oath seductions:
Nothing in the contents of this report is inaccurate to my
knowledge.
DEF
Hopefully, the 2 witnesses on behalf of D should be able
to give evidence tomorrow.
Witness viii
Miss Cordell ATT—16:05—EIC
R V CORDELL 5
D (her son) lives separate from me, but I have been trying
to help him sort out inaccuracies with both his PNC and
other police matters.
Police are still popping around to his house - Simon tells
me, and also, I physically, get to his flat before the police
have left.
He is getting harassed by police.
DJ:
Are 6 officers not reliant—on witness statement - there
for putting a line though that RD.
DEF:
The Material deters with PNC that got included by Met—
Therefore he has a right to challenge this.
Plus, the PNC record is in the evidence and that is not
correct.
DJ: