Page 1033 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

From Page 65 – sergeant King – Crimit’s Re reports,
other Intel but not from people at the venue.
COUNSEL:
Officer you signed a statement off truth ===to other
witness statements.
DJ:
We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
Counsel:
Why did the officer no and rely on PC Kings Statements
later than on the Crimit’s reported?
R V CORDELL 4
Officer no and involved in taking info from PC King.
Confesses he did it.
He states that he did not, notice the discrepancy on
statements.
Officer has heard of Every Decibel Matters—They were
advertising and I believe the D knows a member of the
above company.
No evidence D is involved in running their operations.
There's also no attempt made to speak to directors of the
company.
No reason to why you didn’t /contact the company.
Officer:
I think from memory I have met the D once @ Edmonton
police station.
Counsel:
At Page 16 on the first paragraph the statements are not
consistent to their fact that being that he met him on the
7/6/2014.
All the notes with cad number where listed from reports,
not the police officers' own words and the same applies
from the 999 call Cads that had no input.
Officer has not tried to contact the owners of premises.
Officers unable to assist the courts in relation to why the
statements where not signed and on the notebook profiles.
Another example of doings put in statements to blacken
Mr Cordell’s evidence in the statement @ point 12 that
off there really, being any real convictions that of class A
drugs, unlike what’s written in police officers Statements
of truth and this is another example of untrue cut and
paste evidence.
DJ:
I will ignore that because there is no real convictions of
class A drugs or for supplying them on his record.
Counsel:
The Police officers cannot assist with witness reliability
of the information that got contained, in the Anti-Social
Behaviour Order, can you?
How can the Inelegance be so wrong and inaccurate?
Officer: