Page 1039 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Astonishing of council to make that whole 11 officers
were wrong.
D’s evidence is also not merit able and neither his witness
statements.
D’s Mothers evidence—totally, irrelevant—her evidence
got based on conspiracy, that the police have against her
family.
On the 7th of June: Witness Inspector Hamill and SOS.
Miles witness, Cordell (D).
Inspector Hamill miles, points, to the D being the
organiser, including the disruption and the concern that
the rave caused, this got outlined by the Cad Reports and
police officers' statements.
The 19th July Inspector Skinner describes a rave and
Cordell being the organiser, another statement as far as
the D got concerned, which is wrong.
Crimit’s reports show the D as the organiser, of large
raves according to officer’s statements.
The test mode is out of the submissions above.
There is a consistent Patten of behaviour as by the D
concerned.
1). Test of Public Nuisance?
Does not (text missing) delaminates?
Of fact, but from Cad’s
Re: alarm distress etc which shows that this has
happened.
The impact this has on police resources looking @ noise
levels and potentially, speculating out of control and the
disorder due to shutting the events down.
2457,
Pc Elsmore: Description (of crime) levels after the D was
subject to an order has reduced—there were only 3 since
but when the D was active there were significantly, more.
The order is necessary, and attention drawn to
carefully, word interim order.
Def Closing subs:
The test to get passed is can the allegations get proved.
Deceived that alleged it may be illegal, it needs to cause
Alarm harm or Distress.
Page 2 and 3, is Hearsay from Steve Elsmore once again
and is a copy and paste job.
Pc Parcel is not correct to his file evidence, of the police
Crimit’s, which do contain incorrect evidence that cannot
get backed up, off the D being classed as known for class
A drugs and or supply; —the information is
widely, inaccurate.
The Totality of the evidence is hearsay, and the reports
about Cannery Wharf.
There is No proof that this was an illegal rave, as S.63
CJO 1994 requires, as there is No proof of Tress-Pass—