Page 1041 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Carpet Right—Inspector Skinners evidence—the indoor
test of legality is proof of trespass and nothing got
adducted of him.
It is a Mystery to why no statement got taken from the
owner about the keys?
Also, whether consultations had got given to access the
premises.
On another occasion: Mr Cordell gave explanations to his
presents.
24/07/14
“The D does not accept that he organised the events.,"
Pc Edgoose Page 50—statement said he “organised
illegal raves”
The admissions that are being alleged came from
evidence, that is Entirely, of conversations of other’s and
that are not clear.
27/07/14
Same on Mill Marsh Lane, hearsay evidence of a number
of PC’s, who got called and gave evidence.
It is interesting that someone other than D, (lost text)
has supported evidence of people living and
potentially, others on the land treating it as home and
there is even further evidence, that is inaccurate, regards
shoplifters.
9/10 August
The Evidence of Pc officers, does not match up with
allegations in the application—on his duties, odd their
being squatters, also they did not try too, contact the
owner while on duty, suggesting D was there at a private
party—due to lack of suitable equipment, there is
evidence that the D supported showing that he was
attending a private party.
Councillor.
The General credibility of the witnesses was errors,
because off hearsay and off the Crimit’s of no
prominence, taking into account the weight off the
statement.
Page 32? day and event 2. Inconsistencies that are bios of
officers to include evidence that favours the application
by being unreadable.
R V CORDELL -09-
Allegation of 15 to10 boys (text missing) to talk about
relative of conduct.
Fear of reprisals.
when given evidence the prosecution was to prove sound
organisation, possibly, which D does not accept.
If?
D was polite on his case.
Investigation hasn't gotten performed with the correct
measurements as it should have been.