Page 1042 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

There are Vendetta against the families highlighted.
There are inconsistences between the start of the Crimit’s,
and a complete absinth of follow up, “worrying indeed.”
What other info is wrong, that we could not check?
DJ:
2458,
Mr Justo?? portions???—sum???? and???? Test of????—
Not related to police resources.
Was ASBO serious and persistent?
Def:
Decrease in activity— “huge decrees since Interim ASBO
but no indication of trends: before—after and previous
years.
Pc Elsmore, couldn’t say, why there was a decrease in
raves.
Correspondence of consultation - so far this relies on
wrong and weak evidence.
Met police on points of how the statutory test, in relation
to raves and into what got required.
DJ:
Delivery of judgment @ 15:32pm
Satisfied, so that she is sure, that the D acted, during the
dates in a manner so for the ABSBO to get Granted.
Order necessary for reasons:
Nature of conduct of these parties’
Noise of?
of?
Civil Police officers have to attend in large numbers.
Since the interim order there has been a decrease in this
type of activity.
Satisfied D has acted in as manner, of such conduct, that
he caused harassment alarm, distress.
Conduct is necessary to protect residents of Enfield, from
antisocial acts, from Simon Cordell.
DJ:
Need to ensure probations are precise to award.
DEF:
D’s attendance at raves is not an issue and places
unreasonable burden on him for attending parties when
20 people attended and what appears to be illegal, then
turns out to be legal, also places D in a difficult position
if false steps made to legality of parties, ASBO must be
preventive.
DJ:
D can carry out legitimate and licensed business, Point D;
“or local authority addition”
DJ:
To a period of 5 years” Propitiations are precise and
plain. Terms of the Order.
D: