Page 1044 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1044

was postponed and did not go ahead, that she
                 undoubtedly mentioned, when giving her legal guidance
                 too, such
               2459,
                 accusations of incidents, that does refer to the
                 organisation of illegal raves, that still said “acting in my
                 defence.” It is being said that you did in fact explain
                 before the date of the hearing, I quote; explain being of
                 information regarding to the past representing barrister a
                 Mr. Andy Lock, relating to that of Intel stating that he
                 would not be able to attend court and act for myself as he
                 did previously at the magistrates court, due to being away
                 on leave and this being off the only issue raised by
                 yourself, said to be regarded myself of your concern.
                 On the date of the hearing another barrister did apply to
                 the judge, in aid of my acting solicitors yourself, so to be
                 sure, that of you, having to no longer represent me in the
                 court proceedings, due to a breakdown in communication
                 between our self’s, the judge ruled that Michael Carroll
                 and Co’s solicitors, must act till the conclusion of the
                 case, the overall Point I am highlighting as referred to is
                 that the judge, “on the whole” has ordered the company
                 to act for myself Mr. Simon Cordell.
                 •  The beginning of my Question and request are;
                    With that understanding, I ask and request for you to
                    direct the case to be carried out in such a manner, if
                    what is being request is legal to do so. I request that
                    being off; at the day of my trial, to act litigant with
                    my mother as a McKenzie friend and for a barrister
                    that we do select together, to represent me inclusive,
                    so for he or she to be well instructed to represent
                    myself (in the background” on the days of court.
                 •  First Question is; I also ask of you to set up a
                    meeting and for this request to be inserted within
                    one month of this dated letter, this meeting will and
                    should be between who will be taking on the case,
                    after you leave your office, alongside with the
                    acting barrister chosen.
                    I believe and understand that this is within the
                    constraints of the law; I take my guidance from;
                    https://www.gov.uk/represent-yourself-in-
                    court/overview
                 •  Second Request is;
                      I also request that you call for questioning the
                  following officers and civilians.
                 •  Josher Holyfield: --
                 •  Superintendent Jane Johnson dated 30/ October 2014:
                    --
                 •  Steve Hodgson Dated 30th October 2014: --
   1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049