Page 1046 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Mr. Carroll then went down stairs “Outside of his office”
and then spoke to my mother, there confiscation was; Mr.
Carroll said he will not do anything more on my case,
because too much money had already been spent, to me
he is only worried about money and not someone’s life he
is acting for. I have asked repeatedly for many issues to
be addressed from the start of the on goings of the case,
which has never been done to date, issues such as
defining the conditions that were wrongfully imposed, as
in fact it is clearly omitted in section 63 of the Crime and
public disorder act 1994 and does state that section 63 is
for outdoor events, unless trespass has taken place and all
incidents being referred to are for indoors meaning
private air, also that being of one of many of the fact’s
also being that trespass had never clearly happened.
The representing barrister clearly states in his
submissions to you in paragraph (11) of his notes,
“Quoted “that I was not found guilty under the
respondent’s case”.
If such issues of concern had been addressed as listed in
all of the copies of correspondence of emails as asked,
then I feel it would never have taken up so much of any
person's time as listed in date
22nd May 2016
inclusive of the new up and coming Appeal hearing, as
for sure my case would have already been rectified, I also
believe I would not be feeling deprived of justice and not
with an even further risk of a further date than the new set
appeal date of
September 2016
I do believe you understand from the barrister
submissions, which were sent after the hearing at Wood
Green Crown Court to Michael carols office, this is also
to be inclusive of all the emails that I and my mother have
previously sent to Miss Josephine Ward in regards to my
case, that being said in reference to myself handing to the
judge on two different occasions, a copy of an article six
containing evidence of police corruption in the
development of the application you represent towards
myself.
The issues listed and many other concerns previously
listed have now piled up that must be addressed for
myself to stand a fair and speedy trial, this work has then
been added to the appeal costs and I feel that this has
caused the cost to go up due to no fault of my own as I
was never found guilty and the conditions were imposed
wrongfully, as if surely my concerns were managed
before the start of the trial, when I and my mother were
asked over and over again, the cost would have been
added to the initial trial costs and not too the appeal costs.