Page 1051 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

There is the fact of the matter, which leads me to the concern of the Judge at Wood Green
Crown Court giving the respondent, until the 01/09/2016 to hand over anything that was
needed and what the judge himself asked to be given, as this date set will give me and the
representatives of Michael carol and co solicitors, very little time in order to go over anything
that will be handed over to us and the court.
The question is why did no one say anything about that date as it is so close to the
appeal?
Sixth question is.
As has already been mentioned, I would like to know where I stand; I know you are leaving
Michael Carroll & Co on the 03/06/2016. So, I would like to know the person that will be
taking my case over at Michael Carroll's & CO after you leave, I ask is someone actually
taking over my case at the office?
The worry I have is when I spoke to Michael Carroll at the office, when meeting you Miss
Josephine Ward, is that Mr. Carroll then went downstairs "Outside of his office" and then
spoke to my mother, there confiscation was.
Mr. Carroll said he will not do anything more on my case, because too much money had
already been spent. So, to me he is only worried about money and not someone's life he is
acting for.
I have asked repeatedly for many issues to be addressed from the start of the on goings of the
case which has never been done to date, issues such as defining the conditions that were
wrongfully imposed, as in fact it is clearly omitted in section 63 of the Crime and public
disorder act 1994, That stating section 63 is for outdoor events unless trespass has taken place
and all incidents being referred to are indoors, also that being of the fact trespass clearly
never happened.
The representing barrister clearly states in his submissions to you in paragraph (11) of his
notes, "Quoted "that I was not found guilty under the respondent's case".
If such issues of concern had been addressed as listed in all of the copies of correspondence
of emails as asked then I feel it would never have taken up so much of any person's time as
listed in date 22nd May 2016, inclusive of the new up and coming Appeal hearing, as for sure
my case would have already been rectified
I also believe I would not be feeling deprived of justice and not with an even further risk of a
further date than the new set appeal date of September 2016.
I do believe you understand from the barrister submissions, which were sent after the hearing
at Wood Green Crown Court to Michael carols office, this is also to be inclusive of all the
emails that I and my mother have previously sent to Miss Josephine Ward in regards to my
case, that being said in reference to myself handing to the judge on two different occasions, a
copy of an article six containing evidence of police corruption in the development of the
application you represent towards myself.
The issues listed and many other concerns previously listed have now piled up that must be
addressed for myself to stand a fair and speedy trial, this work has then been added to the
appeal costs and I feel that this has caused the cost to go up due to no fault of my own as I
was never found guilty and the conditions were imposed wrongfully. As if surely my
concerns were managed before the start of the trial, when I and my mother were asked over
and over again, the cost would have been added to the initial trial costs and not to the appeal
costs. But it seems that I get the blame for this when I should not.
I believe since you have looked more into the case and what was being asked of you to be
done for the trial, you have seen and noticed the reason(s) and even further to that why we
wanted this addressed before the trial as it is real points that should have been dealt with at
the trial, you or any person