Page 1055 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1055

Officer has only met D once before.
               D has all ways been polite.
               Has never had any problem with the defendant.
               D was relying eloquent of clearly knows the how.
               Witness Pc Ames - Acting sergeant - R.O -12:46 Pm EIC DEF XEX
               Event was outdoors.
               Saw sound equipment substance speaker’s box.
               Approximately the size of witness box but could not remember really as he was distracted by
               people.
               No further questions.
               Witness - Pc Elsmore - R.O - 14:10 EIC Tab 6 - pg DEF XEX
               The Council is confused that of the PNC info of the statements, Council adds no probationary
               value of info Re: Witness being “afraid of D” Which he puts down to the way he worded, but
               he meant that people actually are afraid of possibly giving evidence in court.
               DEF
               Counsel argues that officer’s statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no
               value and speculatory in nature.
               DJ
               How many calls from public did police receive?
               Witness
               In excess of 15 calls - how many to the same venue and not other address.
               Officer does not know the number of callers in relation to each of these occasions.
               On page 15 - Allegations re: Mill marsh Lane, evidence from officer not first-hand - relied
               on cads and another Intel.
               Query Re:”3 massive nitrous tanks”
               DJ
               Where did you get such info officer
               Witness
               From Page 65 - sergeant King - Crimit's Re reports, other Intel but not from people at the
               venue.
               COUNSEL
               Officer you signed a statement of truth ===to other witness statements.
               DJ
               We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
               Counsel
               Why did officer no and rely on Pc Kings Statements later than on the Crimit's reported.
               R V CORDELL 4
               Officer no and involved in taking info from Pc King.
               Confesses he did it.
               Did not, notice the discrepancy on statements.
               Have heard of Every Decibel Matters - They were advertising and I believe the D knows a
               member of the above company.
               No evidence D is involved in running their operations.
               No attempt has been made to speak to directors of company.
               No reason to why you didn't /contact the company.
               I think from memory have met D once @ Edmonton police station.
                            st
               At Page 16 1  paragraph - not consistent to fact that he met him on the 7/6/2014
               All notes with cad number were listed from reports not officers’ own words - same applies
               from Cads that had not input.
               Has not made any attempts to contact owners of premises.
   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060