Page 1060 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I did XEX Officer of @ no time did he indicate where info had come from, 24/05/2014.
nd
2 Allegations - Application relies on Hearsay again and Crimit's Pages 104 - 107, noted
from evidence.
nd
2 Could hearsay from Josher Holyfield, who allegedly confessed that was looking to set up
raves --(A large section of court transcripts are missing)
Crimit's, “steward not her again.”
RVCORDELL 8
Page 98-100 - hearsay - from a Pc again - all in 3 person, no indication that Pc attended
rd
himself.
No evidence that it was illegal rave.
Show determination in view of illegal rave and no proof has been submitted or covers witness
as victim.
st
No allegations where app. Produced 1 hand evidence.
The particulars of allegations states illegal rave and no proof of the required standards has
been submitted, nothing adduced.
It may be unlikely for presumption that given but it's possible.
In XEX.
App (text missing) del failed to Enfield Council, who did not pursue.
Does it show the organiser or just someone getting involved in things he shouldn't.
Hearsay be (text missing) Grounds are not here.
No evidence police confirmed D to be organiser.
D spoke to police; he gives reasonable Intel, calming he can't keep his mouth shut.
A man who state's his someone else's lawyer.
This is a rave said to have lasted 3 days, but evidence is weak.
Tyrone's presence was untrue, due to life threatening injuries. No competent evidence.
Police had Intel, Re: Every Decibel Matters, with no further line of investigation.
Additional hearsay, only evidence is a van of equipment hired equipment for free.
19/07/2014
Carpet Right - Inspector Skinners evidence - the indoor test of legality is proof of trespass
and nothing adducted.
Mystery why no statement was taken from owner of keys? Also, whether or not consultation's
had been given to access the premises.
On another occasion: Mr Cordell gave explanations to his presents.
24/07/14
“D does not accept he organised”, Pc Edgoose Page 50 - statement said he “did organise
illegal raves” Admissions alleged from evidence, Entirely of conversations of others, not
clear.
27/07/14
Same on Mill marsh Lane, hearsay evidence of a number of Pc's, who were called and gave
evidence.
Interesting that someone other than D, (lost text) has supported evidence of people living and
potentially others on the land treating it as home. Further evidence inaccurate regards
shoplifters.
9/10 August
Evidence of Pc officers, does not match up with allegations in the application - on his duties,
odd their being squatters, also did not try to contact owner while on duty suggesting D there
at private party - due to lack of suitable equipment, evidence D was attending a private party.
Councillor.
General credibility of witnesses was errors, because hearsay of Crimit's of no prominence
taking into account weight of statement.