Page 1062 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Terms need adding
END OF THE COPY OF THE Highbury Magistrates Court Transcripts.
On Monday, 23 May 2016, 3:18, Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
Dear Josephine.
How are you, I hope all is well? After all, things considered, I will get straight into business,
this letter is, furthermore, towards our conversations, however I would appreciate it if you
can reply to my questions below, as soon as practically possible and with due time before you
finish your contract and leave office, so that we can conclude the case files and agreed
activities, such as taking the case to court, so that to be sure that the conditions are imposed
and defined within accordance of jurisdiction of the law, as you have already agreed to do so,
this is also inclusive of all information ready for the next representative of Michael Carroll's
office, who will be the new case handler, so that he or she can be prepared to instruct any
barrister for any court herrings, as per-listed.
Some of the questions are in relation to the understanding of the on goings that did occur, at
and in the court mentioning at wood green crown court, on the 22nd 23rd this is also
inclusive of the 24th 02/2016.
On that date mentioned the company, who you are acting for, that is, representing myself Mr.
Simon Cordell, and further named as Michael Carroll & co solicitors, that you do or did
represent a contract with till the 2nd June 2016,
This information was also inclusive of the understanding of the solicitor firms running
objectives towards the ongoing of this case, that in this instance is being brought against
myself Mr. Simon Cordell by the commissioner of the metropolitan police and his acting
officers, this is also inclusive of any other local authorities governing bodies, one mentioned
as Enfield council. This being quoted being of an application representing a standalone Anti-
Social Behaviour Order 2003, an Act to make further provision in relation to criminal justice
and disorder act 1994.
It is being said that Miss Josephine Ward, at a point of time before the date of the said trial
hearing at Court, that was postponed and did not go ahead, that she undoubtedly mentioned,
when giving her legal guidance too, such accusations of incidents, that does refer to the
organisation of illegal raves, that still said "acting in my defence."
It is being said that you did in fact explain before the date of the hearing, I quote; explain
being of information regarding to the past representing barrister a Mr. Andy Lock, relating to
that of Intel stating that he would not be able to attend court and act for myself as he did
previously at the magistrates court, due to being away on leave and this being off the only
issue raised by yourself, said to be regarded myself of your concern.
On the date of the hearing another barrister did apply to the judge, in aid of my acting
solicitors yourself, so to be sure, that of you, having to no longer represent me in the court
proceedings, due to a breakdown in communication between our self's, the judge ruled that
Michael Carroll and co.’s solicitors, must act till the conclusion of the case, the overall Point
I am highlighting as referred to is that the judge, "on the whole" has ordered the company to
act for myself Mr. Simon Cordell.
First Question and request is.
In that understanding, I ask and request for you to direct the case to be carried out in such a
manner, if what is being request is legal to do so. I request that being off; at the day of my
trial, to act litigant with my mother as a McKenzie friend and for a barrister that we do select
together, to represent me inclusive, so for he or she to be well instructed to represent myself
(in
711,
the background" on the days of court.
Second Question is.