Page 1064 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

and all incidents being referred to are indoors, also that being of the fact trespass clearly
never happened.
The representing barrister clearly states in his submissions to you in paragraph (11) of his
notes, "Quoted "that I was not found guilty under the respondent's case".
If such issues of concern had been addressed as listed in all of the copies of correspondence
of emails as asked then I feel it would never have taken up so much of any person's time as
listed in date 22nd May 2016, inclusive of the new up and coming Appeal hearing, as for sure
my case would have already been rectified
I also believe I would not be feeling deprived of justice and not with an even further risk of a
further date than the new set appeal date of September 2016.
I do believe you understand from the barrister submissions, which were sent after the hearing
at Wood Green Crown Court to Michael carols office, this is also to be inclusive of all the
emails that I and my mother have previously sent to Miss Josephine Ward in regards to my
case, that being said in reference to myself handing to the judge on two different
712,
occasions, a copy of an article six containing evidence of police corruption in the
development of the application you represent towards myself.
The issues listed and many other concerns previously listed have now piled up that must be
addressed for myself to stand a fair and speedy trial, this work has then been added to the
appeal costs and I feel that this has caused the cost to go up due to no fault of my own as I
was never found guilty and the conditions were imposed wrongfully.
As if surely my concerns were managed before the start of the trial, when I and my mother
were asked over and over again, the cost would have been added to the initial trial costs and
not to the appeal costs. But it seems that I get the blame for this when I should not.
I believe since you have looked more into the case and what was being asked of you to be
done for the trial, you have seen and noticed the reason(s) and even further to that why we
wanted this addressed before the trial as it is real points that should have been dealt with at
the trial, you or any person
can see that parts of the respondents case inclusive of the jurisdiction of the law is imposed
wrong, there file is totally incorrect and the timelines are not correspondent to their articles,
sort after many other important parts which was never dealt with correctly, as for fact the
police was allowed to pass such evidence off at the trial as being correct when clearly it was
not correct.
Just listed are many important facts of this case, which should and will aid in myself to get a
fair trial," which I never got at trial."
- Seventh question is.
Could I also be forwarded the trial cost invoice for legal aid so I can see it please?
- Eighth question is.
I have spoken to Michael Carroll on the phone the other day and he is also not willing to do
any other work on this case, and states that the case is ready for appeal, how can it be ready
when there is still information to come from the CPS not later than the 01/09/2016 ordered by
the Judge?
- Ninth question is.
So where am I left with this no acting solicitor to act on my behalf to deal with my appeal as
Michael Carroll clearly does not want to do anything and only says to me to talk to you, but I
know you are leaving the company so where does this leave me? And I feel I will never get a
fair appeal why because of costs, because things were not done, which I asked to be done and
my mother asked for them to be done, why do I feel the way I do about this case and the
worry I have had to suffer?
- Tenth question is.