Page 1061 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1061

Page 32? day and event 2.
               Inconsistencies that are bios of officers to include evidence that favours the application by
               being unreadable.
               R V CORDELL -09-
               Allegation of 15 to10 boys (text missing) to talk unrelative of conduct.
               Fear of reprisals.
               LTC when given evidence was to prove sound organisation possibly which D accepts.
               If? D was polite on his case.
               Investigation not performed with measurements as it should have been.
               Vendetta families highlighted.
               Inconsistence's between start of Crimit's, a complete absinth of follow up, “is simply
               worrying”.
               What other info is wrong, that we have not been able to check?
               DJ
               Mr Justio?? Pitions??? - sum ???? and????
               Test of???? - Not related to police resources.
               Was ASBO serious and persistent?
               Decrease in activity - “huge decrees since Interim ASBO “but no indication of trends: before
               - after and previous years.
               710,
               Pc Elsmore, couldn't say, why there was a decrease in raves.
               Correspondence of consultation - so far this relies wrongfully on weak evidence.
               Met on points of how then the statutory test, in relation to raves and into what is required.
               DJ
               Delivery of judgment @ 15:32pm
               Satisfied so that she is sure, that the D acted, during the dates in a manner so for the ABSBO
               to be Granted.
               Order necessary for reasons:
               -       Nature of conduct of these parties’
               -       Noise of ????/? of ?????? civil
               -       Police officers have to attend in large numbers.
               -       Since interim order there has been a decrease in this type of activity.
               -       Satisfied D has acted in as manner, of such conduct, that he caused harassment alarm,
               distress.
               -       Conduct is necessary to protect residents of Enfield, from anti-social acts, from Simon
               Cordell.
               DJ
               Need to ensure probations are precise to award.
               DEF
               D's attendance at raves is not an issue and places unreasonable burden on him for attending
               parties when 20 people attended and what appears to be illegal then turns out to be legal, also
               places D in a difficult position if false steps are made to legality of parties, ASBO must be
               prevelitive
               DJ
               D can carry out legitimate and licensed business.
               Point D; “or local authority addition”
               DJ “To a period of 5 years”
               Propitiations are precise and plain.
               Terms of the Order.
               D to upset then left room but lawyer present.
   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066