Page 1059 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

There's a possibility that I did say to police that it was a private conference.
DJ
Do you know that 20 people is the maximum - Yes Def XEX
Was Pc Edgoose out of car? - I know two of them come out of car and approached me.
th
24 May Incident - Do you remember speaking with Pc Jackson? Do not remember names.
Paragraph of T and C'S Re Falcon Park (Statement)
Deposit does go back unless damage or loss stopping due to breach of agreement.
Amount = No Fee
NFO
DEF
Additional witness not here, statement can be read but less weight because witness not here.
Witness 2 can be here in 1 half hours Half evidence
R V CORDELL
8
13:30pm DEF
N.F Witness.
Case closing subs.
Statutory test key:
- Whether D has acted in an Anti-Social Manner: Alarm / Distress.
- Astonishing of council to make that whole 11 officers were wrong.
- D's evidence is also not merit and neither his witness statements.
709,
- D's Mothers evidence - totally irrelevant - her evidence is based on conspiracy police
have against her family.
th
- 7 June Witness Inspector Hamill and SO, Miles witness, Cordell (D). Inspector
Hamill miles points, to D being the organiser.
- Disruption and concern Rave caused that is outlined by Cad Reports and officers’
statements.
th
- 19 July Inspector Skinner describes a rave and Cordell being organiser, another
statement as far as D is concerned, which is totally wrong,
- Crimit's reports show D as organiser, of large raves according to officer's statements.
- Test mode out of submissions above.
- Consistent Patten of behaviour as by of D concerned.
1. Test of Public Nuisance? Does not (text missing) delaminates? Of fact, but from Cad's Re:
alarm distress etc. Shows this has happened.
The impact this has on police resources looking @ noise levels and potentially speculating
out of control. - Disorder due to shutting events down.
2. Pc Elsmore: Description (of crime) levels after the D was subject to order has reduced -
only 3 - when D was active was significant more.
3. The order is necessary, and attention drawn to carefully word interim order.
Def Closing subs
1) Test to be passed can the allegations be proven? Deceived that alleged it may be illegal, it
does not need to cause Alarm harm or Distress. Page 2 and 3,
Hearsay from Steve Elsmore is a copy and paste job.
Pc Parcel does not correct to file evidence, of Crimit's, which contained incorrect evidence
that cannot be backed up, of D known for class A drugs and or supply - info is widely
inaccurate.
Totality of evidence is hearsay as well as reports at Cannery Wharf.
No proof this was an illegal rave, as S.63 CJO 1994, No proof of Tress Pass - determination
not proved to Criminal Legal Standards.