Page 1642 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

sighted, and this is also to include Mill Marsh
Lane with no exception.
• Yes, in some I am visiting my friends who
are or were homeless.
• The legal technicality you state, I refer to
i.e. absence of trespass does not prevent parties
from being held in accordance off the law, may
lead to a standalone anti-social behaviour order
if a person commits a public order offence, to
which I did not cause as I was not organizer
neither did I take part in the organisation of the
party or did I commit any civil or criminal
offence.
• In anyone un-regular occasion over the
duration of the weekend I can an understand
the noise nuisance and distress to neighbours
this can cause if the allegations were to be true
and not fabricated by the police as I can
prove. I was not the organizer of the event.
The case got based on what the respondent
based it upon and in my case, this is the
organisation of illegal raves not the
organisation of raves.
1. I proved indoor parties are not illegal unless
there is a breach of the licensing act 2003
as this is the law for entertainment.
2. The word rave cannot get used when
referring to inside of a building, as section
63 requires as a key element: unless
trespass has taken place.
3. I proved I was not the organizer of the
events as I was not.
4. That I never took part in any antisocial
behaviour or intended or encouraged any
other person to neither.
5. Anti-social behaviour never got caused
because of the Progress Way by me or my
actions as I was only a visitor who caused
no offence, I feel as my solicitor you should
have my best interest at heart and if you
Know a police officer to get caught for
being corrupt for, the evidence that they
have supported so your client faced a
wrongful conviction of any sort you should
not encourage them to not stand up for what
is correct and right, so I do not understand
why you would ask me to reconsider
whether the attached document should get
served on the Respondent.
Amendments I made: --