Page 1643 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1643

The amendments I made already got served on
                 the
                 22/02/2016
                 and the Judge ask for the respondent to answer
                 them questions from the
                 01/02/2016
                 and the respondent refuse to do, I insist for the
                 challenges to get answered as it is my life that
                 has gotten tarnished for civil proceedings. I
                 confirm this in writing to you, I feel the
                 meeting has got left by yourself to the last
                 minute I requested this in a multitude of emails
                 to get achieved well in advance to the date that
                 you now sited a few days before the appeal,
                 when I know that you have had ample amounts
                 of time, so if this is the earliest time I will take
                 it and I look forward to meeting Mr Andy
                 Locke, thank you, I do not see how the case
                 will not get re listed due to lack of disclosure to
                 be frank.
                 I do not understand why any solicitor would
                 encourage me to go to trial or appeal and not
                 draft out the police corruption that you
                 can see making me accept the fabricated
                 evidence and wrongful conditions, I know
                 got imposed on myself under section 63 with
                 no trespass taking place, this being said as for
                 any of the incidents in the Asbo and with you
                 knowing the true facts about them incidents
                 being in private air. There is also the fabricated
                 evidence I am standing against as for sure
                 any solicitor works in Co Hurst towards the
                 understanding off noun precedent in relation to
                 the weight of any evidence put towards a client.
                 I get concerned about the case,
                 relying solely, on hearsay by police. Is this
                 correct in procedure?
                 However, I understand and take note, which all
                 resident parties contained within the
                 respondent’s bundle, where held in single
                 occasions and in places of residence and where
                 not held as a running commercial business by
                 myself or by any other to my knowledge. I also
                 read any person may have a house or resident
                 party in private air under the licensing act 2003
                 or where they live. To my understanding, each
                 accused incident in the respondent’s bundle is a
                 place of residence and were, in fact different
                 people holding their own private parties at their
                 places of residence. Aloe there may have been
   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648