Page 717 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

What you are saying in your emails is that the judge says in his letter that I got to take an
assessment, but this is not the case as part 3 of his letter states. " If the Appellant wishes to
rely on any medical evidence as to his mental health, then any report dealing with such
matters must be before the court on the 4th April 2016"
Which states, “if I wish to rely on any mental health evidence, then a report has to get
submitted by the 04/04/2016,” but this does not say I must rely on this, and I do not wish to
rely on this. Can you please take my case back to court so that my conditions can get defined,
and also for a meeting to take place, once you get the letters you are waiting for so we can
deal with the appeal, Can you also please send me the notes from court, from the public
defender that was there for me please as I have not had these. Also, the issue about the public
order unit if they are not willing to give all the information, then they need to get summoned
to court for the appeal. Also, what will happen as to the missing CAD and the errors in the
CAD and with the statement off inspector Coomb’s. The case is that I organised illegal raves
on page two of the applicant’s first bundle it states I quote "The Defendant got involved in
the organisation and conduct of illegal raves. These, primarily, take place on disused or
industrial land in London and cause alarm and distress to the residents, these raves are
licensing activity, cause significant noise pollution and, lead to destruction of property and
breaches of the peace. In defence to my case the 2nd line down states the Defendant got
involved in the organisation and conduct of illegal raves, I have sent you the licensing act
2003 apex 4 which states, house party’s and places of residents do not need a licence, which
all the incidents in the applicant's bundle are places of residence in contained fencing in
private air. In the licensing act it states this includes gardens and private car parks. I linked
index page 4 of the licensing act 2003 within this document, which states unless profit is
being made, to which I am not being accused of, then there is no breach of the law, and there
for not illegal. For members of the public to have a moving in-house party is not a breach of
law and therefore not illegal. The word rave clearly states the key element, such as in the
open air must be present and when in private air trespass must be present. So, what law have I
broken to make the case law abiding under reasonable doubt if I am not being accused of
making a profit it is not illegal to organize a private house party for any British citizen as long
as you have respect for the residents living around the local area?
Thanks Simon Cordell
PS. Regarding the statement off; “These, taking place on disused or industrial land
in London and cause alarm and distress to the residents.” All the locations are a place of fixed
a bow and residence. Regarding “These raves are licensing activity, cause significant noise
pollution and, lead to destruction of property and breaches of the peace. No home is
licensable, unless a breach of the 2003 licensing act got made, to which contained within the
applicants bundle and there is none. I have a bundle of the laws relevant to my case that
should be in my defence bundle, please will you help me go over them and I would like to
trade products with my company as I have explained to you for months and keep asking you
to take the case back to court to get my bail conditions defined, which you have not to date
even low Andy Lock states that I am right in my points of law and how it leaves me in a state
of utter confusion to what I may do or not, as the applicants case gets based on illegal raves,
their banning me from what is lawful legal. We cannot think of any jobs the conditions will
not have an effect on, of that of my profession's, I cannot be a delivery driver, as most
companies deliver to industrial estates, I cannot deliver parcels or goods to any person living
under a section 144, this is not correct in law, I am, concerned, as to the applicant’s case is
for an Asbo in its civil manner that it sits in at court. The case got based on illegal activities,
to which I never had the right to defend my innocents in. An ASBO on conviction is when a
person has committed criminal activities when I got so called, found guilty and there is such a
need to apply for a court to sit in its civil capacity to obtain such an order against any person,