Page 721 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 721

Which clearly states; “if I wish to rely on any mental health evidence then a report has to be
               submitted by the 04/04/2016,” but this does not say I must rely on this, and I do not wish to
               rely on this.
               Can you please take my case back to court so that my conditions can be defined, and also
               have a meeting once you get the letters you are waiting on from Superintendent Adrian
               Coombs so we can deal with the appeal.
               Can you also please send me the notes from court from the public defender that was there for
               me please as I have not had these as of yet.
               Also, the issue about the public order unit if they are not willing to give the information then
               they need to be summoned to court for the appeal.
               Also, what is going to happen as to the missing CAD and the errors in the CAD
               The case is that I organised illegal raves on page two of the applicants first bundle it clearly
               states I quote "The Defendant is involved in the organisation and conduct of illegal raves.
               These primarily take place on disused or industrial land in London and cause alarm and
               distress to the local residents. These raves are licensing activity, cause significant noise
               pollution and directly lead to destruction of property and breaches of peace."
               In defence to my case the 2nd line down clearly states The Defendant is involved in the
               organisation and conduct of illegal raves, I have sent you the licensing act 2003 apex 4 which
               states, house party’s and places of residents do not need a licence, which all the incidents in
               the applicants bundle are places of residence in contained fencing in private air. In the
               licensing act it states this includes gardens and private car parks. I have linked index page 4
               off the licensing act 2003 within this document, which clearly states unless profit is being
               made, to which I am not being accused off, then there is no breach of the law, and there for
               not illegal.
               For members of the public to have a moving in-house party is not a breach of law and there
               for not illegal.
               The word rave clearly states the key element such as in open air must be present and when in
               private air trespass must be present.
               So what law have I broken to make the case law abiding under reasonable doubt if I am not
               being accused of making profit it is not illegal to organize a private house party for any
               British citizen, as long as you have respect for the residence living in around the local area?
               In regard to the statement off, “These primarily take place on disused or industrial land in
               London and cause alarm and distress to the local residents.”
               All locations are a place of fixed a bow and residence.
               In reference to “These raves are licensing activity, cause significant noise pollution and
               directly lead to destruction of property and breaches of peace."
               No home is licensable, unless a breach of the 2003 licensing act has been made, to which
               contained within the applicants bundle their ins none.
               I have a bundle of the laws that are relevant to my case that should be in my defence bundle,
               please will you help me go over them.
               I would like to start trading my company as I have explained to you for months and keep
               asking you to take the case back to court to get my bail conditions defined, to which you have
               not to date even low Andy Lock states that I am right in my points of law and how it leaves
               me in a state of utter confusion to what I am aloud to do or not as the applicants case is
               based on illegal raves there for banning me from what is lawfully legal.
               I cannot think of any jobs the conditions will not have an effect of that my professions are in,
               I cannot be a delivery driver, as most company deliver to industrial estates,
               I cannot deliver parcels or goods to any person living under a section 144, this is not correct
               in law.
   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726