Page 725 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

hard. As far as he is aware the building was being occupied by people to live in, he states he
does not know anything Joshua said to police about know any think about a rave. Mr Simon
Cordell did not manage to visit him on this day.
At no point is Mr Simon Cordell being accused of acting in an anti-social manner on this
date, or by any members of the public inclusive of members of the police, neither was he
arrested.
Hyde Park 20th 04 2014
725
499,
STATEMENT OF WITNESS new new.doc
In Reference to Pages 213 - pages 98 to 100 created by Steve Hoodless yr contained within
the applicant’s first bundle. 5 St George’s Industrial Estate,
It is said that on 25.05.14 Mr Simon Cordell was involved in the organization of and / or
supplied equipment for and or attended an illegal rave at unit 5, St George’s Industrial Estate,
Whit Heart Lane,
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that he did not attended any premises on this date to rave
neither was her involved in the organization off any raves, nor did he supply equipment for
an illegal rave at unit 5, St George’s Industrial Estate, White Hart Lane, N17.
In respect of Mr Simon Cordell presence at Unit 5 St George’s Industrial Estate,
White Hart Lane on 25th May 2014. He attended a commercial building that the occupiers
were residing in, having displayed section 144 LASPO notices and in turn treating the
premises as their home. Nothing was said to Mr Simon Cordell about a rave by any of the 20
occupiers. He will state that he was visiting friends and they were just sitting and chatting
while having a laugh. He remembers taking about ways to better life for himself and his
friends as well as others.
There was no music being played or about to be set up. He was not involved in the
organization of an illegal rave of any sort no Acts of the licensing Bill 2013 was being
broken.
Mr Cordell will state; “have used the speaker box’s to play sound, he did ask the police too
note this down, and that he was only using the van as storage, this is why the police officers
who were in attendance allowed him to leave, while talking to the current occupiers of the
premises.” “that he did drive there in his van VRM CX52JRZ, and he does accept that he had
2 speaker boxes in the van; however, he did not have a full sound system present with himself
and the speaker boxes did not have any drivers in them, so he and others could not
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that he did not on the date in question have what would
constitute as a full sound system like what he accused of and is now being pursued by the
applicant. Mr Simon Cordell will state that he was not rude to the police, that he allowed his
van to be searched by members of the police and nothing was seized, and He went home. Mr
Cordell will state that he did not cause any anti-social behaviour on the 25th May 2014 or any
other behaviour that might have caused alarm harm or distress to others.”
Since this ASBO application was served on Mr Simon Cordell, he has moved the speakers
out of his van and they are still in the (open air), at his mother’s address and are in the back
garden still to date, as if in the first day that off when he had taken them out of his van, with
no drivers in them because he felt uncomfortable ball because of the terms of the ASBO
application. Mr Simon Cordell states yes at the time it would have been better to keep them in
his van due to the weather, but when he does intend to go for a drive that he does not feel safe
any longer travelling with any sound equipment.
It is also noted that on page (98 of the main applicant’s bundle) that the report was created on
the 26/05/2014 for criminal damage, the event date, is noted at: