Page 730 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

arriving from the Great Cambridge road, and that of the police asking him questions in
regards to illegal raves. A Inspector Hamill states that he ask Mr Simon Cordell his name and
that he gave him a reply, such as to the answer of “yes” verbally and then A Inspector Hamill
states that he asked Mr Cordell the same question again but Mr Cordell would not reply,
(chapter one of (A) Inspector Hamill statement page 33 the 5th line down;) he then states the
3rd time when Mr Simon Cordell was asked again, but this time by the council officers with
inspector Hamill present his name, that he would not reply again, Mr Simon Cordell will state
that he did not speak to anybody, he just listened to what was being said to him and complied
when he was asked to walk back to where he had just parked his vehicle. The police officer is
incorrect in saying that Mr Cordell was the person that the gate assistant went and collected,
as the event organiser, as Mr Simon Cordell was in fact approaching the occupied building
and was visiting his friend. He did state this in his first statement dated (24th/02/2015.) Mr
Simon Cordell will State that, as he was approaching the ally way were tops tiles is before the
entrance gate for progress way as stated by A/Insp Hamill 201566 on (page 33 2nd line up
from the last sentence.) Simon remembers it being dark and a lot of people being present in
the ally way. Mr Simon Cordell will state that he saw, who he now knows to be A/ Insp
Hamill for the first time, at around 2:00 am on the 8th June 2014 as he was arriving and had
not seen a police officer on the date in question, till that point of time, when he had seen An
Inspector Hamill talking too other people at the gate than himself as he was approaching, Mr
Cordell will state he does remember the police trying to speak to him and that he felt that the
police was accusing him of being an organiser, to which he was not, so he choose not to say
any think, without a solicitor being present.
The Police and council let Mr Cordell go and he walked across the road to the petrol station,
while waiting for his friend to turn up, which he had to give a set of keys back too.
Crown Road == There was no Licensable events or private parties on the 2nd apart from
Crown Road that is contained within the applicant’s bundle, a council freedom of information
act has been provided, from local council as proof of this statement. (Exhibit)
(Cad 3151 8th June 2014 page 278) clearly states that the rave / private party was at crown
road not progress way relating to cad 3151 8th June 2014 and that members of the public
were using Southbury train station, to get to this location, which is across the road from
Crown Road the old man building which is grid reference; X (Easting) 534960 Y (Northing)
196240
Under oath to the DJ A/Insp concealed the truth true facts of evidence. Please read court train
scrip off (A) Inspector Hamill below.
(This also proofs that all the Cad’s are linked together and corrupt)
Witness 1 - inspector Hamill -R. O - 11.15am Statement contained in tab 9-lead
DEF XEX
Intel would be by open source, checked by an officer but was not done by me.
The rave was taking place indoors.
I have not personal spoken to the owners of the venue.
I only see the D on the Saturday on the evening of the 7th Saturday.
I did not go inside; the gates were closed.
I did not see any vehicles.
D’S Van reg is known to the police but I would not personally know.
There were vehicles parked but I did not notice whether defendants van was there.
He was not aware of people squatting in that building at that time.
(Hearsay of officers continues D @ venue but (unreadable text) Officer (unreadable text) Not
present here today.)