Page 728 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

would he be on any CCTV cameras committing any offence on this date in question. That he
did in fact arrive and had ordered food. He used his van to travel from his home to where his
friend was staying. Due to storage space and the size of the speakers, Mr Simon Cordell will
state that he could not remove the speaker boxes on his own because of the size and weight of
each box and used his van as storage on some occasions.”
On the 25th May 2014 the police checked the index CX52 R2 and there were two speaker
boxes with no speakers in them that Mr Simon Cordell will state that he had keep in the van.
There was no amps or deck’s inclusive of any other equipment to power or create a full sound
system just two speakers that he keeps in there for storage. The police could see there was no
way to run a sound system and allowed him to leave.’
Mr Simon Cordell will state; that he is not sure if the people were still allowed to stay in
their home by the police.
Ref: Pc Hoodlese states; “Approx. 20 young males and females ran out the rear of the
premises."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “at no point was he one of the males or females that run out of
the building.”
Ref: Pc Hoodlese states; “Approx. 20 people are claiming to be squatters."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that at no point was he one of the 20 people occupying Unit 5
St. Georges Industrial Estate White Hart Lane N17, living under a section 144 Laspo treating
and respecting it as their home, as for fact he was a guest and has his own home.
Several males were still inside the premises calming to be squatters."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that as said people were occupying the building and that he
went home.”
Ref: Pc Hoodlese states.
“Police had footage of several suspects causing damage to the security cameras and door
locks.”
Mr Simon Cordell will state that was not one of them people."
Mr Simon Cordell will state that at no point will he be on any of the said camera evidence as
he never committed the offences stated, he believes if he were on the security cameras then
criminal charges would have been placed on him. At no time have any charges be placed
against Mr Cordell he will state that as he was not one of the suspects causing any damage.
Mr Simon Cordell will state that if police officers watch the security cameras footage that this
would also show in court Mr Cordell was just a visitor.
Ref: Pc Hoodlese states.
“At the venue."
Mr Simon Cordell will state that this was a commercial building being occupied under
section 144 Laspo, as far as he was aware and had been told by the occupiers they had been
living there for weeks before this date, they had their belongings and bedding at the
premises."
Ref: Pc Hoodlese states; “Caught on camera opening the venue upon opening the premises."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; that he will not be on camera acting in an anti-social manner
neither will he be causing any criminal offences, that he was invited into the premises by the
occupiers that were living there."
In Reference to the 6th 7th 8th JUNE 2014; Progress Way in relation to the Applicants first
bundle.
In relation to the 06/07/8th June 2014 Mr Simon Cordell will state that he was not involved in
the organization of and / or supplied equipment for and / or attended an illegal rave at an
empty warehouse on Progress way Enfield.
In the applicants bundle there are 93 incident numbers relating to the 6th 7th 8th June 2014
that Mr Simon Cordell is being accused of and only 34 complete cad files in the bundle, to