Page 952 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

/ Page Numbers: 684,685,686,687,688,689

--

1
Dear Josephine: --
How are you, I hope all is well? After all and things considered, I will get straight
into business, this letter is: towards our conversations, however I would appreciate
it if you can reply to my questions below, as soon as: practically, possible and in
due time before you finish your working contract and leave your work office for
good, as you have explained that you will do, shortly, in time, so that we can
conclude the case files and agreed activities needed to take place, such as taking the
case to court, so that we are sure that the conditions get not imposed on me, by
them being defined within accordance of jurisdiction of the law, as you have
already agreed to do, this is also inclusive of all information ready for the next
representative of Michael carols office, who will be the new case handler to get
prepared with my case files in a good order and informed well. I would like this
achieved so that he or she can get prepared to instruct any barrister representing me
for any up-and-coming court herrings. Some of the questions I have for you are in
relation to the understanding off the on goings that occurred, at and in the court
mentioning at wood green crown court, on the
22nd 23rd
this is also inclusive of the
24/02/2016.
On that date mentioned the company, who you are acting for, representing myself
Mr. Simon Cordell, and further named as Michael Carroll & co solicitors, that you
do or represented a contract with till the
02/06/2016
(reason said listed in the 3rd paragraph.)
This information was also inclusive of the understanding off the solicitor firms
running objectives to the ongoing of this case, that is being brought against myself
by the commissioner of the metropolitan police and his acting officers inclusive of
other local authority governing bodies, mentioned as Enfield council. That being of
an application representing a standalone Anti-Social Behaviour Order 2003, an Act
to make further provision in relation to criminal justice and disorder act 1994. It is
being said that Miss Josephine Ward at a point of time before the date of the said
trial hearing at Court, that got postponed and did not go ahead, that
she undoubtedly already mentioned, when she gave her legal guidance to me, about
such accusations off incidents, that gets referred to as the organisation of illegal
raves, that still said “acting in my defence.” It is being said that you did in fact
explain before the date of the hearing, I quote; explain being of information
regarding towards the past representing barrister for myself a Mr. Andy Lock, say
that relating to that of Intel of the barrister that he himself could not attend court
and act for myself, as he did previously, at the magistrates court, due to being away
on leave and this being off the only issue raised by yourself, said to get regarded
myself off your concern. On the date of the hearing another barrister applied to the
judge in aid of my acting solicitors yourself, so to be sure that off you having to no
longer represent me in the court proceedings, due to a breakdown in
communication between our self’s, the judge ruled that Michael Carroll and Co’s
must act till the conclusion off the case, the overall Point I am highlighting as