Page 956 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

do not specifically, refer to any acts of anti-social behaviour; that Mr. Cordell got
involved in.
He has not even got arrested for any of the offences accused on the dates in
question.
There is also an issue of concern that got supported in the fact by him stating the
respondent's is in error because the case claims the allegations off “The
organisation of illegal raves” under section 63, which is a criminal Act and of the
word illegal being used when there is no breach under the licensing act 2003
as is required for it to be illegal.
This leads to a clear breach of police enforcement off their police of codes of
conduct off power regarding residences, private homes, equalling to issues of
wrongful jurisdiction that concerns “private house party’s” under the Licensing act
2003 as in apex 4 off the licensing act 2003, it states as printed below;
Private Events 15. 3, events that get held in private are not licensable unless those
attending get charged for the entertainment, to make a profit (including raising
money for charity).
For example, a party held in a private dwelling for friends featuring live music,
where a charge or contribution got made solely, to cover the costs of the
entertainment would not be regulated entertainment.
Similarly, any charge made to the organiser of a private event by musicians, other
performers, or their agents does not of itself makes entertainment licensable–it
would only do so if the guests attending where themselves charged by the organiser
for that entertainment to achieve a profit.
The facts are this might inadvertently, result in the organiser making a profit would
be irrelevant as long as there had not been an intention to make a profit. 15. 4
Schedule 1 to the 2003 Act also clarifies that before the entertainment
gets regarded too being provided for consideration, a charge has to be:
• made by or on behalf of a person concerned with the organisation or management
of the entertainment; and
• paid by or on behalf of some or all of the persons for whom the entertainment gets
provided, the licensing act 2003 has since gotten amended to date.
07th January 2013
and states no breach.
On the
12/07/14
at time 09:53 a police officer of rank; PC surname; Elsmore, first name; Steve,
badge number; 711,243 YE, logged into the police national computer and
did f such an application for the commissioner of England and Wales, fabricate and
manufacture such evidence alongside with other listed officers.
This got done by way of conspiring and concealing the true facts and if not for the
location grid numbers not being retracted, alongside with other information has
been deliberately, retracted, so to conceal the true facts of my innocents, the
Met police officers who created such a forgery, would get away with their wrongful
intentions, which could only lead to a judge given me a wrongful guilty verdict at
the day of trial, as happened.
Such claims of the police and no first-hand witness that get supported by
overwhelming corrupt evidence, must get supported to get a guilty verdict beyond
reasonable doubt R v bone 1968.
This corrupt evidence got created and edited while manipulating the statements of
truth, which can get proven in mutable different ways.