Page 961 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

The view of my barrister, is this was a very questionable decision:
Firstly: the respondent based their case against me on the illegality of rave’s rather
than the fact of them being legal private party, themselves.
Secondly: my barrister stated that with no proof of illegality the presumption
of innocence leads to the conclusion that the raves were legal, and thus, Simon
being prohibited from engaging in an ostensibly, lawful activity does in fact require
more careful consideration of issues of proportionality.
It should get agreed with the barrister statement as when dealing with this case, we
were addressing the respondent’s case to prove I had not got involved in organizing
illegal raves, as this is what the application against me was.
In total up and till this date of the 19/04/2016 the so called Asbo application has
gotten brought before the courts and this is also to be inclusive of magistrate’s
courts and the crown courts a total of nine times.
The 10th time will be on the month of September 2016.
I personally, alongside many other people still do not understand how any person
could stand a fair trial with such question’s and evidence, as I have supported the
prosecution, with in my defence, as has also got referred to by my representatives, I
understand that there are many breaches of my Human Rights that have accord
because of the police brutality I get faced with,
Article 5.2 of my continental human rights is one of many that has got breached, as
for the fact by the respondents supported Asbo application, being of fraudulent and
misleading evidence.
I am being illegally, being deprived of such rights as the Article 5(2) requires by
law; it states anyone arrested must get, promptly informed as to why he or she has
gotten arrested and what the charge against them is.
This must get conveyed to them in a language which he or she understands.
And as also permitted under Article 5(2) it requires this requirement enables the
person to challenge the lawfulness of their arrest.
This requirement is not limited to criminal context; —
This leads me to questioning some of the facts of the case.
Like, I never got arrested for the allegations that have gotten brought into motion
that are of a criminal offence, that state they are of an illegal nature, such as “the
organisation of illegal raves” and that of how a court can sit in its civil
capacity sitting a criminal case under section 63 of the crime and public disorder
act 1998 as a standalone Asbo,, if it is illegal I must get arrested first then charged
and if found guilty, then a Cbo Asbo can get applied for after conviction, a Cbo
Asbo application doe’s state the following.
The criminal behaviour order (CBO) will replace the ASBO on the conviction off
criminal offences and the DBO on conviction and will be available in the Crown
Court, magistrates’ courts, or the youth court, the CBO will be available for the
most serious anti-social individuals and could apply to on conviction for any
criminal offence in any criminal court and the CBO can only get made on the
application off the prosecutor (in most cases the Crown Prosecution Service, either
at their own initiative or at the request of the police or local authority.)
I also question the true facts about why no one will withdraw the cases to which I
have supported evidence towards my innocents in the Asbo Order application.
There are so many inconsistencies contained within the police statements that a
guilty verdict must not get justified.