Page 963 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

solely, on the cps, who are in collaboration with Revenue and Customs Prosecution
Office and gets headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) who is
independent but subject to the superintendence of the Attorney General accountable
to members of Parliament that work for the prosecution services.
If charged any person's rights get gained under section 24 and 25, which relates to
the rights of any person getting charged and the minimum standards of criminal
procedure.
But my problem is, my case seems to sit in its civil capacity at court with none of
the above regulations and my rights being carried out under the United
Kingdom laws; please can you explain this to me?
I also have no previous convictions of similar nature offence, neither was the Asbo
application a Cbo or Asbo on conviction, it is in fact a standalone Asbo and the
legal guidance is for the application not to get based upon. Criminal offences.
At the appeal date that had got set for Feb 22nd, 23rd 24th 2016 Legal aid was
granted and got granted on the 00/00/2015.
On the 2nd appeal date set Mr Simon Cordell’s acting solicitor explained to him
that she could not arrange a barrister till April 2016, due to the past acting barrister
being on leave.
Mr. Cordell had many concerns with the respondents case that got put towards
himself and on that day had prepared a computer type printout copy of an article
six, that does in fact raise some of the issues of concern that he had with the on
goings of the application being put towards himself, this got given to the Judge
HHJ Pawlak’s, who refused to read and note the official document that regards
Simon's human rights, continental rights and ordered that he the applicant, answers
five questions: A to E by the date off a pre hearing: dated the 4th April 2016, the
questions the judge asked to get answered are in another attached file in this
complaint.
On the same day of 22nd /4/2016 I again asked in a written letter handed to the
judge requesting for the right to a fair trial and in that letter I believed I had proven
to him more than beyond reasonable doubt that the developers such as
officer PC Steve Elsmore in the making off the Asbo application had manufactured
and fabricated the evidence.
I supported this by drawing a table contained within the letter and I knew this
showed the errors in the time stamps to be corrupt, I also explained that I Am
getting held against my free will because of the application.
At the day of trial in the magistrate’s court I never got found guilty of such crimes
or offences as stated in the transcripts of the day at the court and in the barrister’s
submissions to my acting solicitor.
It got explained to the judge that by him not paying attention to the true facts of the
case and not putting the police officer under investigation that it would in fact in
danger my life.
I explained to every person of interest relevant to the ongoing of my accused case
load from the start that I felt and still felt intimidated and threatened, off the police
office being given time to edit more evidence in the case to manipulate the truth
and take disregard to rules and regulation to avoid a complaint of investigation
pending against themselves, Police officers and council officials avoiding and
prolonging disciplinary action taking away my security off walking down my home
town streets, for a period off this case, is not right.
The judge once again allowed me to get held hostage to corrupt police officers’
allegations.