Page 962 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I have submitted in the response bundle to the prosecution evidence beyond
reasonable doubt of my innocents in many of the accused allegations I defend my
innocents towards.
With no fair response.
The prosecution is in receipt from me, the defendant: off overwhelmingly amounts
of evidence of my innocents, which also partly shows police corruption.
Within the context of the Asbo Orders application, it shows that of a magnitude of
a mutable amount off geological locations of different wide spread incidents, that
are all on the same date and around the same time’s, as the one incident that I
Am being accused of, which is on the 6th 7th, 8th June 2014.
These other different widespread incidents do in fact not relate to the anti-social
behaviour incidents that I Am being accused of.
Some of the incident in the Asbo seem to have the locations blocked out, this has
got done by members of the metropolitan police force, who developed of the Asbo
Order application done this so to prevent the course of justice and this leads to my
dissatisfaction of a rightfully, not guilty verdict.
Because of the grid numbers being blocked out, no person’s; other than the
developers of the application, who would have known the true facts as just
explained, could defend themselves.
Once checked and recognised by any other person in response to the claims I have
just quoted, I believe any other person would also notice many of the irregularities
that are fact fraudulent and come to the same conclusion, so in the understanding
off the statements just made and the understanding that Mr. Simon Cordell is an
innocent man from the start of on goings of the Asbo application, that this is wrong
in law.
I knows that I did not commit the allegations, nor did I have my legal rights put
into place to challenge such claims, under the criminal justice acts that represent
the United Kingdom Laws and European Treaties.
From the start of the application I, Mr Simon Cordell have felt the need to defend
my legal right’s against, such allegations off the falsified statements, that got made
by the police officers, against me, the same as any other would if they to where to
face the same allegations, that got made by any other members off the public about
themselves.
No members of the public have mentioned me or a description off my person or
any other associated company names or business names that do relating to me.
the incidents accused of me are of such offences create the bases of an illegal
Criminal conviction of (The organising illegal raves,) Which should never have
gotten prove in a courthouse.
In the understanding off civil and criminal law, Mr Simon Cordell has learnt that in
all criminal cases, where something got alleged to have taken place and got said to
have been illegal the correct Police procedure in them circumstances is that a crime
will get created under the crime and disorder act 1998.
This will get achieved by way of a victim or witness making a report of a crime
than them or other members of the police force will get allocated, too the incident
and start investigations depending on the matter of relevance to the initial report to
the resources available.
The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead the detainee to his or her
statuary legal rights.
In the early 1980s the police had the power to take cases to court without the
decision off any other governing body, but now in 2016 /17 the burden relays