Page 957 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

As an instance, when the police officers representing the ASBO order logged into
the police national computer system each report got created one after the other, but
with falsified created date’s, which is a clear breach of police procedures. or in
other cases opened months after the created date and edited, so to aid in conspiring
to falsify information.
This could only get done to help aid in wrongful claims, to in fact gain help police
officers to gain a guilty verdict against me, the defending victim.
There is also that being of the fact relating to the chronological sequence of the
CAD reports, due to the time stamps being in error that got listed here that are sure
to be of foul play; —
CAD 2637 07/06/2014 08:18 Page 191 to 195
CAD 2672 07/06/2014 08:16 Page 196 to 198
CAD 3005 07/06/2014 09:22 Page 203 to 205
CAD 3037 07/06/2014 09:20 Page 179 to 183
CAD 10481 07/06/2014 22:47 Page 233 to 237
CAD 10506 07/06/2014 22:44 Page 238 to 241
To put an even further burden on the justices, system officers made such claims,
while reciting and seeking wrongful jurisdiction of law as for fact section 63 crime
and disorder act 1998, regarding outdoor events, as omitted unless trespass has
taken place, no incidents that Simon is being accused of is in fact in open air land
and trespass did not take place, neither do the police provided any evidence
supporting such claims.
Please see article from The World Wide Web of section 63 public and disorder act
1994
at;
http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01889/SN01889.pdf
What gets stated in the Pdf web-linked above is;
Under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, the police have the power to
stop raving.
Until January 2004, these where defined, as unlicensed open-air gatherings of 100
or more people in which loud music gets played during the night.
New provisions introduced into the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003, which came
into effect on January 2004, reduced the number of people who make up, to a rave
from being: 100 to 20, and removed the requirement for the gathering to be in the
open air.
It also introduced an offence of attending another trespasser rave within 24 hours of
a police direction, to stop people moving the rave to another place.
There have been press reports of police in some areas holding back from using
their powers for health and safety reasons because of the dangers of dispersing
large crowds in the dark or because of other dangerous local conditions.
However, there have also been reports of successful police action to control raves
in particular areas.
Gatherings for which an entertainment licence got obtained, do not get classed, as
raves within the meaning off the legislation.
However, there was controversy about so-called licensed “raves” under provisions
in the Licensing Act 2003 what came into force, in November 2005.
These allow people to get temporary event notices for gatherings of up to 499
people for events lasting up to four days.