Page 972 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 972

To: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
               Subject: Can you take a look at this please and tell me what you think about sending it
               05/05/2016
               Dear Josephine
               How are you I hope all is well? I would appreciate it if you can reply to my questions below.
               In the understanding of the on goings that did occur at the court mentioning at wood green
               crown court on the 22nd 23rd and 24th 02/2016, when on that date mentioned the company,
               who you are acting for that is representing myself Mr. Simon Cordell, that is named Michael
               Carroll & co solicitors, that you do or did represent a contract with till the 2nd June 2016.
               Before the 22nd 23rd and 24th 02/2016 when giving your legal guidance to such accusations
               of incidents, referring to the organisation of illegal raves, that said in my defence this is
               inclusive of the understanding to the ongoing of the case, that is being brought by the
               commission of the metropolitan police, that being of a standalone Anti-Social Behaviour
               Order 2003, an Act to make further provision in relation to criminal justice and disorder act
               1994, itis being said that you did in fact explain before the date of the hearing, that being of
               information regarding to the past representing barrister Mr. Andy Lock, relating to that of
               Intel stating that he would not be able to attended due to being on leave and this being of the
               only issue raised by yourself said to be regarding myself, but on the date of the hearing
               another barrister did apply the judge in aid of my acting solicitors yourself, so to be sure of
               that you have to no longer represent me due to a breach in communication between our self's,
               the judge ruled that Michael Carroll and co.’s must act till the conclusion of the case, the
               Point is the judge has ordered the company to act for myself and in that understanding I ask
               and request for you to direct for my case to be carried out in such a manner, if legal to do so?
               I request that being of; at the day of my trial to act litigant with my mother as a McKenzie
               friend and for a barrister we select together to b< instructed to represent myself on the days of
               court, also I ask of you to set up a meeting within one month of this dated letter, between who
               will be taking on the case after you leave your office with the acting barrister chosen. I
               believe and understand that this is within the constraints of the law I take my guidance from
               https://www.gov.uk/represent-yourself-in-court/overview I also request that you call for
               questioning the following officers;
               I ask again am I correct in believing that this is my rights and I can still have Michael Carroll
               and co solicitors represent me if I do so?


               77.
               Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
               77. 1. 2
               Asbo Me to Josie 05-05-2016 16-25
               05/05/2016
               / Page Numbers: 678
               679,680,681,682,683
               --
               678,
               From: Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
               Sent time: 05/05/2016 04:25:17 PM
               To: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
               Subject: hhh
               05/05/2016
               Dear Josephine
   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977