Page 974 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Met police procedures, to which I proved my innocents in start date 00/00/00 end date
00/00/00.
Substance off the complaint made by Mr. Simon Cordell is;
Listing:
Issues:
(I) Whether Mr. Simon Cordell has between the dates of January 2013 to the last date being
10 August 2014 in the Borough of Enfield acted in an anti-social manner likely to cause
harassment alarm or distress to one or more persons not of the same household as himself.
Mr Simon Cordell is accused of being involved in the organisation of illegal raves. These
take place on disused warehouses or industrial land. These raves are said to be licensable
activities.
Mr. Simon Cordell case is that he has not acted in an anti-social manner on the dates in
question.
and that he has not organised or supplied any equipment for any the events cited in the
Respondent’s application.
Mr. Simon Cordell has and still is in the legal framework as he challenges and disputes the
evidence presented that he
were an organiser.
1. It is Mr. Simon Cordell case that this ASBO was imposed upon him unlawfully for the
following reasons:
- He was never consulted / or warned prior to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner
applying for an ASBO and this is in breach of the Guidance.
- The imposition of the ASBO was wrong in law because nowhere in the Respondent’s
case has the Respondent proved that Mr. Simon Cordell engaged in any acts of anti-social
behaviour as defined under section 1(1) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. The dates as
cited in the Respondent’s application dating from 12th January 2013 up to 19th July 2014 do
not specifically refer to any acts of anti-social behaviour. Mr. Simon Cordell was and has not
been arrested for any offences on the dates in question, also supporting the fact being that of
the respondent’s case stating and being that of
679,
“The organisation of illegal raves” under section 63 which is a criminal Act and that of the
word illegal being used when there is no breach under the licensing act 2003 this leads to a
clear breach of police enforcement of their police codes of conduct of power regarding
residences private homes of issues concerning “private house party’s” under the Licensing act
2003 as in apex 4 of the 2003 licensing act it clearly state as printed below “
(c) that on the 12/07/14 at time 09:53 a police officer of rank pc surname Elsmore first name
Steve badge number 711243 YE was logged into the police national computer and did in
development of such an application for the commissioner of England and Wales, did fabricate
and manufacture such evidence alongside with other listed officers, this was done by way of
conspiring and concealing true facts and if not for grid numbers not being retracted alongside
other information that has been retracted creating such forgery by officers, which could only
lead a judge to gain a guilty verdict at trial, this was also done while creating and editing
statements of truth, which can be proven by the associated unique Urn numbers attached to
police officers intelligence information reports running consecutively with maybe a few
minor adjustments, but still very clear to see and understand as most do start with urn
000378829 then urn 000378829, urn 000378830 and so on “as when police officers were
logged into the police national computer each report was created one after the over but with
falsified created date’s” a clear breach of police procedures, falsifying this information could
only be done to help aid in wrongful claims, to in fact gain a guilty verdict against the
defending applicant Mr. Simon Cordell. while reciting and seeking for issue of wrongful