Page 975 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

jurisdiction of law as for fact section 63 crime and disorder act 1998 regards outdoor events
as omitted unless trespass has taken place, no incidents that Mr. Simon Cordell is being
accused of is in fact on open air land and trespass did not take place neither do the police
provided any evidence supporting such claims also that being of the fact relating to the
chronological sequence of the CAD reports due to the time stamps as clearly listed here;
CAD Numb Date Time Page
CAD 2637 07/06/2014 08:18 Page 191 to 195
CAD 2672 07/06/2014 08:16 Page 196 to 198
CAD 3005 07/06/2014 09:22 Page 203 to 205
CAD 3037 07/06/2014 09:20 Page 179 to 183
680,
CAD 10481 07/06/2014 22:47 Page 233 to 237
CAD 10506 07/06/2014 22:44 Page 238 to 241
The Appellant will state that this ASBO is disproportionate and it prevents him from
engaging in lawful business. The ASBO will prevent the Appellant from applying for
licences to hold events. The Appellant will state that whilst he is subject to an ASBO he will
be prohibited from applying for any entertainment licence and any licence application will
automatically fail and therefore this is disproportionate.
The Appellant has designed a business plan, a festival plan and community event that sets out
clearly the plans for events including marketing, safety, stalls etc and also specifically refers
to cooperating with the police. The ASBO prevents any applications from being successful.
The Appellant will state that he has never been involved in the organisation of an illegal rave
as defined under section 63 of the CJPOA 1994.
Mr Simon Cordell State’s: “that he was not rude to police, but he did feel like he cannot even
go out for the day with some of his friends, without getting stopped and searched by members
of the police.
Mr Simon Cordell State’s This Asbo application was created in the understanding that by pc
Steve Elsmore and other acting officers acting in such a manner of the claims listed within
this document and or by allowing other officers to use his id logging to gain such wrongful
and illegal convections did do so upon oath to the legal services, new Scotland yard London
sw1h OBG Reference number L/107087/sag and stated that he was sure that the defendant
Mr. Simon Cordell was responsible for the acts to which particulars had been given, in
respect to the complaints made and developed by them self's which are all concealed within
the Asbo application, in turn knowingly and deliberately while intentionally misusing his and
their powers of conduct, while and with complete disregard of regulations such as the NSIR
national standards incident report 2011, to aid in a manner to which was reckless and caused
extreme disregard for my and other human life's creating a breach of many human rights as
listed below with the relevant issues of concern in regards to each set of human rights that
have been breached.
• Article 2 Right to life
Article 2 requires that the Government take steps to safeguard the lives of everyone within
the U K's jurisdiction inclusive of myself Mr. Simon Cordell:
- by having effective criminal legislation (i.e. by making murder and manslaughter an
offence so that to be sure that no person has the right to kill any other human being this
clearly is inclusive of attempted manslaughter or attempted murder) and properly enforcing
it;
- by requiring the police to take reasonable steps to protect an individual’s life if they
know or ought to know that there is a real and immediate risk to a person’s life - although this
should not impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities; and