Page 978 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

referred to regarding article 5.2 of my continental human rights as for the fact of the
supported application being that of myself Mr. Simon Cordell being legally deprived of such
rights as
Article 5(2) requires that anyone arrested must be promptly informed as to why he or she has
been arrested and what the charge against them is.
This must be conveyed to them in a language which he or she understands.
The defendant questions the facts that of himself not being arrested for allegations of a
criminal offence that do clearly state that they are of an
682,
illegal nature such as “the organisation of illegal raves” and that of how a court can be sitting
in its civil capacity sitting a criminal case under section 63 of the crime and pubic disorder
act 1998 as a standalone Asbo dated 00//00/2014 and associated to the laws of this date as for
a CBO Asbo application existed and still does and states
The criminal behaviour order (CBO) will replace the ASBO on conviction and the DBO on
conviction and will be available in the Crown Court, magistrates' courts, or the youth court.
The CBO will be available for the most seriously anti-social individuals and could be applied
for on conviction for any criminal offence in any criminal court. The CBO can only be made
on the application of the prosecutor (in most cases the Crown Prosecution Service, either at
their own initiative or at the request of the police or local authority).
of as permitted under Article 5(2) which clearly states the purpose of this requirement is to
enable the person to challenge the lawfulness of their arrest.
This requirement is not only limited to criminal context.
Also that of their being so many inconsistencies contained within the police statements as has
been submitted in the response from the defendant Mr. Simon Cordell in receipt to the
applicant dated 00/00/2016 which clearly shows that of mutable geological locations of wide
spread incidents on the same date and same time as the one incident that Mr. Simon Cordell
th
th
th
has been accused of on the 6 7 8 June 2014 which does in fact have all the locations
blocked out by members of the metropolitan police force and if it was not for the grid
numbers not being blocked out no person other than the developers of the application would
have known the true facts as just explained.
Once checked and recognised by any other person in response to the claims I have just
quoted, I believe that any other body would also notice many of the irregularities that I have
shown to be fact and come to the same conclusion, so in the understanding of the statements
just made and the understanding that Mr. Simon Cordell is and was an innocent man from the
start of on goings of the Asbo application and knows that he has not committed nor has he
had the right to challenge such allegations under the criminal justice acts that represent the
United kingdom Laws and European Treaties. As from the start of the application Mr Simon
Cordell feels the need to defend his legal right’s against such allegations of illegal statements
made by police officers against himself the same as he would if the allegations were made by
any member(s) off the public to which no members of the public have mentioned him or a
description of his person or any associated company or business names relating to the
incidents of such offences creating the bases of a legal conviction of (organising illegal raves)
In the understanding of civil and criminal law, Mr Simon Cordell has learnt in the
understanding off all criminal cases were some think is alleged to have taken place that is
said to have been illegal the correct Police procedure in them circumstances is that a crime
will be created under the crime and disorder act 1998 by way of a victim or witness making a
report then members of the police will be allocated to the incident and start investigations
depending on the matter of relevance to the initial report to the resources available at the
time. The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead the detainee to his or her
statuary legal rights. In the early 1980’s the police did have the power to take cases to court