Page 981 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

information regarding to the past representing barrister Mr. Andy Lock, relating to that of
Intel stating that he would not be able to attended due to being on leave and this being of the
only issue raised by yourself said to be regarding myself, but on the date of the hearing
another barrister did apply to the judge in aid of my acting solicitors yourself, so to be sure of
that you have to no longer represent me due to a breach in communication between our self's,
the judge ruled that Michael Carroll and co.’s must act till the conclusion of the case, the
Point is the judge has ordered the company to act for myself and in that understanding I ask
and request for you to direct for my case to be carried out in such a manner, if legal to do so?
I request that being of; at the day of my trial to act litigant with my mother as a McKenzie
friend and for a barrister we select together to be instructed to represent myself on the days of
court, also I ask of you to set up a meeting within one month of this dated letter, between who
will be taking on the case after you leave your office with the acting barrister chosen. I
believe and understand that this is within the constraints of the law I take my guidance from
https://www.gov.uk/represent-yourself-in-court/overview I also request that you call for
questioning the following officers;
I have also made the basics of a police complaint as documented here.
Met Police 1of 3 created on date 06/00/2014 cad number 00
Complaint
1
Met Police 2of 3 created on date 16/04/2016 cad number 00
Complaint
2
Met Police 3of 3 created on date 17/04/2016 cad number 00
Complaint
3
In reference to Metropolitan Police complaint 3 of 3 that is in relation to an Anti-Social
Behaviour order under the criminal and public order act 1994 in order of the commissioner of
the metropolitan police.
I am Simon Cordell; my date of birth is 25th January 1981. My home address is as stated
above. I am making this official complaint further to my appeal dated 00/09 2016 in response
to the police and local authority's application for an Asbo order, to which, the case against my
self is one of an hearing of application, against the organising illegal raves, that has said too
have been proven as a guilty verdict, this is said to be against myself Mr. Simon Cordell, to
which I intend to prove that this is not correct. I was not found guilty under the applicants
case alongside many other issues of concern as listed, The day of the courting was held at
Highbury Corner Magistrate’s Court, to which I intended to prove my innocents at, the next
and earliest appeal hearing date has now been set for Sep 2016 to my disappointment, as I
have been proving my innocents since 13 August 2014 when first accused and before this
th
application I had been on string Lent bail conditions that had been imposed for other ongoing
Met police procedures, to which I proved my innocents in start date 00/00/00 end date
00/00/00.
Substance off the complaint made by Mr. Simon Cordell is;
Listing:
Issues:
(I) Whether Mr. Simon Cordell has between the dates of January 2013 to the last date being
10 August 2014 in the Borough of Enfield acted in an anti-social manner likely to cause
harassment alarm or distress to one or more persons not of the same household as himself.
Mr Simon Cordell is accused of being involved in the organisation of illegal raves. These
take place on disused warehouses or industrial land. These raves are said to be licensable
activities.