Page 979 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

without the decision of any other governing body, but now in 2016 the burden relays solely
on the cps who are in calibration with Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office and is
headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) who is independent but subject to the
superintendence of the Attorney General that is accountable to members of Parliament that do
work for the prosecution services. If charged any person’s rights are gained under section 24
and 25 which does relate to the rights of any person charged and the minimum standards of
criminal procedure. But my case seems to sit in its civil capacity at court with none of the
above regulations and my rights being carried out in accordance of the United Kingdom laws;
please can you explain this to me? As I have no previous convictions of similar nature neither
was the Asbo application a CBO or Asbo on conviction it is in fact a standalone Asbo and the
legal guidance is for the application not to be based upon
th
rd
nd
At the appeal date that had been set for Feb 22 23 24 2016 Legal aid was re granted on
the 00/00/2015
nd
On the 2 appeal date set Mr Simon Cordell’s acting solicitor explained to him that she could
not arrange a barrister till April 2016, due to the past acting barrister being on leave.
Mr. Simon Cordell had many concerns with the applicants case put towards him and had
prepared a computer typed copy of an article six that does in fact raise some of the issues of
concern that he had with the on goings of the application being put towards himself “a
attached file of a copy of what was handed to the judge has been attached as (Exhibit 2 that
being of this document being off Exhibit 1)”, this was given to the Judge HHJ Pawlaks who
refused to read and take note to such human continental rights and ordered that I the applicant
th
Mr. Simon Cordell answer 5 questions A to E by a pre hearing date of the 4 April 2016 the
questions asked and answered are in another attached file(Exhibit 3) in numeric order to this
complaint. On the same day of 22 /4/2016 I again asked in a written letter handed to the
nd
judge requesting for the right to a fair trial and in that letter I believed I had proven to him
more than beyond reasonable doubt that the developers such as officer pc Steve Elsmore in
the making of the Asbo application had manufactured and fabricated such evidence of claims
of evidence, I supported this by drawing a table contained within my hand written letter to the
right to a fair trial I know this shows the errors in the time stamps too be corrupt, I also
explained that I had been held under my free will, as the laws that do represent “the
organisation of illegal raves” relating to such a section as section 63 does not account to an
indoor private house parties unless trespass has taken place and that on the 00/00/0014 at the
day of trial at the magistrates court I was not found guilty of such crimes or offences as stated
in the transcripts of the day at court and in the barristers submissions to my acting solicitor,
also the fact that being of under the licensing act2003 there is no breach of law when holding
such private events in private air when no profit is being made to which the applicant has not
adduced any evidence supporting claims of money equalling to profit, the incidents Mr.
Simon Cordell is and have been accused of was in fact in private place of residence
It was explained to the judge that by not paying attention to the true facts of the case and not
putting the police officer under investigation would in fact in danger my life Mr. Simon
Cordell as I had been explaining to every person of interest relevant to the ongoing of my
accused case load from the start of the case as I felt and still do feel intimidated and at threat,
off the police office being given time to edit more evidence in the case to manipulate the truth
and take disregard to rules and regulation to avoid a complaint of investigation pending
against himself in turn avoiding by method of prolonging disciplinary action in turn taking
away my own security off walking down my own home streets for a period of this case to
date 19/04/2016 equalling to the time length of start date of application said to have been
served in accordance to the united kingdom laws to which an official police complaint was
th
raisin as listed in the first chapter of this document is 12 September 2014 total days are
00000000 The judge once again asked