Page 690 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All
P. 690

referred this incident to an investigating officer
                 and created a crime reference number 5200 37618.
                 18.    The Claimant also advised the police of
                 the incidents dated 02nd and 3rd January 2018
                 but the police confirmed that they could not take
                 actions as at the time of the incidents the civil
                 injunction was discharged by the Court. The
                 police advised that had the injunction been in
                 place, the Defendant

               14,
               13th December 2017
               13th December 2017
               09th August 2017.
               02nd and 3rd January 2018

                         CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

                   IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

                                  BETWEEN:

                                 {CLAIMANT}

                  THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
                     LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

                                      -AND-

                                 (DEFENDANT)

                            MR SIMON CORDELL

                             DIRECTIONS ORDER

                 could have well been arrested in light of Mr
                 Mathiyalagan being able to evidence the incident
                 by way of the audio recordings.
                 19.    The recent incidents and death threats are
                 extremely serious and i have concerns that the
                 Defendant may escalate his actions further. Mr
                 Mathiyalagan and his family do not feel safe
                 anymore and on that basis, it would be of great
                 assistance if the Claim and injunction order be
                 reinstated as soon as possible.
                 Declaration from the Court that the injunction
                 order has been effective throughout the period
                 of 13th December 2017 to present
                 20.    The interim injunction order was
                 discharged purely because of a technicality,
   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695