Page 691 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

however had the Court realised that the Claimant
had filed the questionnaire on time, it would not
have struck out the Claim.
21. The Court should note that the Defendant
started to act anti-socially again, soon after he was
notified by the Court that the interim order has
been discharged. Unfortunately, because the
Claim was struck out the Claimant and the police
are currently not able to take any actions against
the Defendant. It is on that basis that we would
like to ask the Court for a declaration that that the
interim injunction order has been effective since
13th December 2017 and that the Defendant has
been in breach of the interim injunction order
dated 09th August 2017.
22. However, in the event that the Court
cannot make such a declaration, we would ask the
Court to make a new injunction order to cover the
recent incidents dated 02nd and 3rd January
2018 and enclose a new claim for an injunction
for the Court's consideration.

15
09th August 2017
11th November 2017
02nd and 3rd January 2018.
08th January 2018

CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

-AND-

(DEFENDANT)

MR SIMON CORDELL

DIRECTIONS ORDER

Permission to bring and serve an application
for the Defendant’s committal under CPR 81.