Page 109 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 3rd Half

To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
<Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
Hello Jamie
Maybe you can send to his work email I believe this is his work email address
rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk
well that's what it says when I do a Google search on his name. Maybe you could also get a
phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work email you would know he
got it or if you called and was able to talk to him you would know if he even wanted to help
in this, Maybe he has had the letters but know he does not need to help if he does not want to,
maybe send someone round to the address you have. This is just some ideas not sure if you
can use them.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk
[mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 22 September 2017 16:35
3505,3506,3507,3508,3509,3510,3511,3512,

2
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
843. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (1)
/ Page Numbers: 3513,3514,3515,3516,3517,3518,3519,3520,3521,3522,3523,
From: Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 31 October 2017 15:55
To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk'
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
Dear Jamie Newman
Thank you for the update. What I cannot understand is how your supervisor could say PC G’s
actions likely did not constitute a criminal offence. PC G wrote his statement around 2 hours
after this took place, knowing he left facts out so he had a case against my son to take him to
court, thinking we could not get the audio recording which you have copies off, now from
what I know he wrote down the person name he spoke to in his notebook, and I believe that
would be in his notebook, and I believe when a police officer is writing his statement, he
would also use his notebook to make sure he did not forget anything in his statement, so how
could he have written the statement the way he did forgetting so much out? Maybe it was
because he knew we had already put a complaint in?
I am sorry but a police officer would not forget what he said to the insurance company when
he lied to them to void Mr Cordell's insurance which he nearly did. He then carried on with
the lies to take my son to court, and due to us not having the recordings at that 1st hearing my
son was found guilty due to these lies, and PC G lying in court. We then took it to appeal, but
this time I did have the audio tapes, he stood in that court and admitted he had not even
searched the van, but yet he told the insurance company there was loads of tools and Mr
Cordell was going round doing odd jobs, so know he lied to my son's insurance company, in
the lower court to get my son found guilty, then lied in the Crown Court at the appeal
hearing, how much more lies is needed so it would be classed as a criminal offence? At the
appeal hearing if we did not have them audio tapes, I am 100% my son would have been
found guilty again. If this was my son that done this and not a police officer my son would
have been charged and would have had to face the courts and would likely have gone to