Page 110 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 3rd Half

prison, because Judges do not like any person lying in their courts. I am upset as I do know if
this was my son who did this he would have been charged by the CPS and had to face a court,
why is it when the police do something wrong nothing ever happens. I do know I will have
the right to Appeal to the IPCC once I get your report, but if this investigation was done
correct the 1st time and the DPS did not breach their own codes of conduct to allow this
police officer off with a slap on the hands and by not giving us the right of appeal before this
was done and I had been allowed to take this to the IPCC before this process happened, this
police officer would have not been allowed to leave the police force as he would have been
under investigation still. As it stands this police officer who lied in 2 courts, wrote a
statement that was not the truth and full facts, has now been able to get a job as head of
criminal justice. Please explain how what this police officer done would not constitute a
criminal offence?
Regards
Lorraine
From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 31 October 2017 09:10
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
Hello Lorraine,
I apologies for my delayed reply.
3514,
I appreciate your concerns re timeliness. As you know I discussed this matter with my
supervisor last week. Being the matter of greatest importance to you I first discussed the
possibility of a CPS referral prior to the matter being sent to our appropriate authority for a
final determination. Here, my supervisor was not of the mind to refer the matter to the CPS,
citing that PC G’s actions likely did not constitute a criminal offence. I understand this will
come as a disappointment to you, however our appropriate authority may still decide the
matter should be referred to the CPS upon the conclusion of the re‐investigation. Of course,
should this not be the case you will still have a right of appeal to the IPCC on this issue.
Going forward, I do not propose to continue to seek a further account from PC G, instead I
shall set to work on completing the report with the information I have in my possession. Here
I note your wish for the matter to be concluded quickly and the potential benefit that such a
further account would add to the investigation. Although it is difficult to give definitive
timescales, I hope to have the report completed by the end of November. As previously
promised, as per your requests under the Police Reform Act, upon the completion of the
report I shall send out a copy of PC G’s notebook, together with any other documents that
may be of interest to you. If you’ve any further questions please do get in touch.
Kind regards
Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards |
Met Phone 786675
Telephone 0207 161 6675
Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’
From: Lorraine Cordell
mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 27 October 2017 21:26
To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
<Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>