Page 209 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table

very pressured, difficult to interrupt and at times frankly rambling. There was
clear evidence of thought disorder with flight of ideas (rapid shift of ideas with
some superficial apparent connection). Mr Cordell struggled to sustain his
goal of thinking as he often derailed to themes of relevance to him, digressing
away from the topic of discussion. It was very difficult to obtain a direct
response to the queries posed to him and follow his thread of conversation.
o Mr Cordell’s thought content was replete with various delusional beliefs of
persecutory and grandiose nature. He spoke of an elaborate conspiracy which
involves the Enfield local authority and the metropolitan police, dating back
since 2013, when he claimed that he was arrested for putting up a gazebo in
his garden which led to him being barred from visiting
209
129,
places in central London and placed on a curfew from 10 pm. Mr Cordell informed
that he followed these restrictions imposed on him for about a year and returned to
Court and won the case. Mr Cordell then went on to talk about Sally Gilcrest, the
legal executive for the metropolitan police who he alleged set him up for a million
pounds and brought on an ASBO against him, which ended with him being imposed
on a nine-year curfew. Mr Cordell stated that Sally Gilcrest in conjunction with the
borough commander Jane Johnson and the community officer started spreading
rumours that he was “suffering from herpes and has hurt a woman” which the
neighbours in his block became aware of and started sending him messages
addressing him as “you black boy”. Mr Cordell implied that Sally Gilcrest colluded
with the neighbours as she had a vested interest in getting him out of this country.
He stated that the neighbours above him deliberately bang on his ceiling and have
also subject him to other forms of harassment since 2014. Mr Cordell implied that
the neighbours were responsible for the miscarriage suffered by his then girlfriend
and also held them responsible for the separation from his previous girlfriends. He
further stated that between 2014 and 2016, his mother has made numerous
complaints to the council regarding the harassment he has been subject to and he
has won a criminal case against his neighbours
o Mr Cordell then went on to elaborate his grievance against Lemmy, the officer
who works for the Enfield local authority. He claimed that he received an
email from Lemmy threatening that he would obtain a possession order
against him and asking him to attend a meeting. He then stated that the ASBO
that was served against him was not valid due to lack of signature. Therefore
Lemmy built a false case against him by using “lower grade cases" to pursue
a possession order and subsequently an injunction order, by falsifying
statements and using “statements from dead cases”. According to Mr Cordell
this was declared as invalid by a Judge, however Lemmy has continued to
produce false orders against him in the way of a second injunction, which he
claimed has never been served on him. Mr Cordell described this as “targeted
malice" by Lemmy as he has used the injunction as a smoke screen to cover
up the ASBO by providing false statements and witnesses.
o In addition, Mr Cordell also described a number of grandiose beliefs, stating
that he was building a constitution on CIC, which he explained to be
Community Interest Company. He also spoke of a number of other businesses.
He was keen to show us the various documents, emails, and recordings he has
accrued as evidence to support his case.
209