Page 205 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 205

seems an order was sealed at Edmonton Country Court which was not agreed on which was
               Enfield Council drafted order, which we never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what
               was said in court.
               I believe a lot of what was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being
               said, maybe someone should ask Ludmilla Iyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Iyavoo
               said she would go for a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she
               wanted.
               124,
               There is also the fact that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on
               the 25/10/2018, it was the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not getting
               the section 3 on my son they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son said as soon
               as he knew they was not allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they would kick him
               out of the hospital, as this is what they did in 2016, and the next day the 15/11/2018 that is
               what the doctors did kicked him out the hospital, yet my son was willing to stay and build
               trust up with the doctors and the mental health team, which had broken down due to what has
               been ongoing for some time.
               Which in fact would have been a lot better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like
               he wanted maybe by now they would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams, this
               is what Soohah Appadoo wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with trust and
               stated this at the appeal on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 16/11/2018 I myself spoke to
               Soohah Appadoo on the phone, but since that we have heard nothing from him is this what is
               being called support put in place when my son was discharged from hospital?
               This misleading information needs to stop as it is a beach of the data protection act.
               I look forward to hearing from you regarding this, please can you reply as I did not get a
               reply from you to my last email, I sent to you.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               Classification: OFFICIAL
               Classification: OFFICIAL
               Be the first to receive the latest Council news straight to your inbox
               SIGN UPONL NENOW
               www.enfieldgov.uk/enewsletters
               Enfield Council is committed to serving the whole borough fairly, delivering excellent
               services and building strong communities. Opinions expressed in this email are those of the
               individual and not necessarily those of the London Borough of Enfield. This email and any
               attachments or files transmitted with it are strictly confidential and intended solely for the
               named addressee. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not
               the intended recipient and receive it in error you must not copy, distribute, or use the
               communication in any other way. All traffic handled by the Government Connect Secure
               Extranet may be subject to recording/and or monitoring in accordance with relevant
               legislation.
               This email has been scanned for viruses, but we cannot guarantee that it will be free of
               viruses or malware. The recipient should perform their own virus checks.
               125,
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210