Page 204 - 11. 2019 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 204

I was wondering if you was going to reply to the below email as it has been a few days since
               I sent it and I feel this is very important due to the action going to be taken from Enfield
               Council, and I did not have a reply to my last email to you.
               I would like the incorrect information corrected that is being used, and without a reply I
               cannot do this, I have attached a copy of your letter sent to the MP dated 12/12/2018.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Lorraine Cordell
               mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk
               Sent: 17 December 2018 17:12
               To: 'Andrea Clemons
               alev.cazimoglu@parliament.uk
               123,
               Subject: RE: Mr Simon Cordell. 109 Burncroft Avenue. EN3 7JQ
               Dear Andrea Clemons
               Today the MP's aid for Joan Ryan, Alev Cazimoglu sent me a copy of your letter dated the
               12/12/2018, I am shocked to see what is written within it and the misleading information
               being passed over to the MP Joan Ryan.
               It was not agreed on the condition that Mr Cordell should engage with mental health services
               and provide medical evidence to support the housing management transfer application. The
               court did not state this, so I do not know where this is coming from.
               I also do not understand where it is coming from that Mr Cordell had to provided supporting
               letter from the mental health services to support his management transfer application, and he
               has not done this, he was never meant to have done this and the management transfer
               application was completed by Enfield Council to go to the panel on the 17/08/2018 and it was
               ready to go to the panel on this date, but this was deferred to be considered at the next panel
               meeting which would have taken place on 28/09/2018, which never happened.
               The reason for it being deferred was so that I Miss Lorraine Cordell could try and get a letter
               from the mental health team, which I could not so it therefore should have gone ahead to the
               panel on the 28/09/2018, which I do have the emails to prove this. I also do not understand
               why Enfield Council is stating supported accommodation was being asked for as this was
               never asked for. I did however state in court that a 2 bedroom would be better as my son
               could have family live with him so he could get support from his family; I have never said I
               am his carer I have never said a lot of things that Enfield Council is stating I have said.
               It was stated in the court order.
               •  UPON the Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage
                   with the Claimant and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing
                   management transfer application on or before 16 August 2018.
               •  UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with the housing management transfer
                   application as quickly as possible after being made.
               •  AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental Health
                   Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions
                   and housing.
               The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council,
               but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council
               order until she came back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she was on
               annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this.
               Upon her return from annual leave her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo,
               which my son’s solicitor never had a reply back from Ludmilla Iyavoo regarding her
               amended order, but some days after the amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Iyavoo, it
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209