Page 599 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

th
nd
rd
22 23 and 24 02/2016 Set for appeal at the crown court.
599
417,
Si-Information-Part-Edited-01.doc
th
rd
It is said that Mr Cordell had been found proven partly on the 3 4 August 2015, to which
he disputes to be correct.
th
rd
nd
An appeal date has been set for Feb 22 23 24 2016
Legal aid was re granted on the 00/00/2015
In understanding that Mr Simon Cordell’s acting solicitor has explained to him that she
cannot arrange a barrister that every barrister that has been asked will not take the case on
due to the size of the case and due to it being at appeal stage and legal aid will not cover the
cost of such a large case. I have been explained that Andy Locke who did the trial at the
lower court is on sabbatical leave till April 2016, and that the acting solicitors wish to put the
appeal date of until April 2016 when Andy Locke will be back from sabbatical leave.
If granted by the Judge this would in fact set the new appeal date to be two months after the
already agreed appeal date of 22rnd February 2016, if the court agreed to such a date,
contained within the time scale of April 2016 and not any time after, due to the court diary
already being pre booked.
Mr Simon Paul Cordell is asking for a Former judge to examine the role of police officers,
who present the applicant cases of an ASBO order against himself.
Mr S. Cordell is asking for this to be assessed and agreed under the grounds of Article 6 of
the European Convention on Human Rights, the Right to a Fair Trial Act 1998, Legislation.
Which in legal terms, should be the best means of separating the guilty from the innocent and
protecting against injustice. Without this right, the rule of law and public faith in the justice
system collapse. The Right to a Fair Trial is one of the cornerstones of a just society.
Article 6 the Right to a fair hearing:
The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy itself.
The right applies to both criminal and civil cases, although certain specific minimum rights
set out in Article 6 apply only in criminal cases.
The right to a fair trial is absolute and cannot be limited. It requires a fair and public hearing
within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. The
procedural requirements of a fair hearing might differ according to the circumstances of the
accused.
599
418,
Si-Information-Part-Edited-01.doc
The right to a fair hearing, which applies to any criminal charge as well as to the
determination of civil rights and obligations, contains a number of requirements and I believe
the causes below full within them requirements.
An ASBO order has been appealed against after the magistrates court decided a decision to
prove the application case in part but with no legality being proven, the decision had been
made against Mr Simon Cordell, this was at Highbury Corner, Magistrates Court, on the 4th
August 2015 in pursuant to s.1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 it was agreed to make
him subject to an Anti-Social behaviour order. This was in pursuit for the Commissioner of
Police of the Metropolis.
The respondent’s case is that Mr Simon Cordell has been accused of being integrally
involved in the organisation of illegal raves in London and Enfield.
Part of the Barrister submissions that represented Simon Cordell, had been that the
allegations were that he was involved in the organizing of illegal raves, but the applicant
hadn’t adduced evidence, of trespass or evidence of breach of the licensing Act 2003 which is