Page 602 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

- missing people cad 10393 to 10462 time missing So; -
- 78 people cads 10393 to 10471 time 7 mins
rd
- 10 people cads 10471 to 10481 mins 2 mins Cads 10481 to 10506 (3 Time Laps
22:47 to 22:44)
The time stamps go back for the 3rd time, so to even be able to work the true format is
impossible.
602
421,
Si-Information-Part-Edited-01.doc
Supported Evidence, supporting the fact that the CAD's supporting the applicant ASBO
should not be time stamped wrong, this evidence does include.
- Standard Operational Guidelines - East of England.
http://www.eastamb.nhs.uk/FOI%20Docs/Disclosure%20Log/Emergency%20Op
s/July%202013/F15152h%20-%20attachment.pdf
- National Standards for Incident Recording (NSIR) Collection and recording of police;
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment data/file/11 6658/count-
nsir11.pdf
- Understanding Control Command; http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts UC2.pdf
- police Central Communications Command incident procedure;
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lkd4sarsfdMC&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&dq=police+Cent
ral+Communications+Command+incident+procedure&source=bl&ots=663ZhaKX9&sig=Z7
DgHlgJncwLNuam0g8EBcCja8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif39YsMbKAhWI8A4KHdn
MAoQQ6AEIMzAE#v=onepage&q=police%20Central%20Commnications%20Command%
20in cident%20procedure&f=false
Point 2
Blocked out Inc locations and other relevant information that should be contained within the
cads that have been presented in the applicant’s bundle. Only in serious circumstances in
cases such as were it is absolutely necessary to aid in the prevention of witness or victim
intimidation should an officer be trusted to block out such information.
Under oath pc Steve Elsmore state to the district Jude that he “Intel would be by open source,
checked by an officer but was not done by me.” When in fact it is his login that created and
printed the applicants bundle this can be proved by his signature and also by the computer id
log that must be used to print the data contained within the Police National Computer and
now has been submitted and is contained with the applicants bundle and is verified at the top
of most of the pages or within.
Pc Elsmore states under oath that he did not carry out any further investigations in regard to
speaking to the owners of any premises to fix that of a notice of trespass or conviction of
twok as the main investigating officer. “I have not personal spoken to the owners of the
venue”
Pc Elsmore states under oath “There was a rave on an adjourning RD but not on that day.”
(Please Take Note Here of inspector Hamill stating under oath that he was sure all
locations were to do with progress way on this date.)
“Phone calls received were not relating to Crown Rd Rave on that day.
On the day in question phone calls related to this particular rave. (Progress Way)”
CADS CONTAINED WITHIN THE BUNDIL THAT ARE PRINTED IN Pc Steve Elsmore
name and as the leading investigator he would have known the truth to the locations blocked
out that are in fact crown road another house party a five minute drive from progress way and
if not for the grid numbers being not blocked out inclusive of
602
422,