Page 604 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

On page 15 - Allegations re: Millmarsh Lane, evidence from officer not first-hand - relied on
cads and another Intel.
Query Re: “3 massive nitrous tanks”
DJ
Where did you get such info officer.
Witness
From Page 65 - sergeant King - Crimit’s Re reports, other Intel but not from people at the
venue.
COUNSEL
Officer you signed a statement of truth (unreadable text) to other witness statements.
DJ
We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
R V CORDELL 5
Counsel
Why did officer no and rely on Pc Kings Statements later than on the Crimit’s reported.
Officer no and involved in taking info from Pc King.
(Confesses he did it.)
He did not notice the discrepancy regarding official statements.
Have heard of Every Decibel Matters - They were advertising and I believe the D knows a
member of the above company.
No evidence D is involved in running their operations.
No attempt has been made to speak to directors of company.
No reason to why you didn’t /contact the company.
I think from memory have met D once @ Edmonton police station.
(At Page 16 1st paragraph - not consistent to fact that he met him on the 7/6/2014) All
notes with cad number were listed from reports not officers’ own words - same applies from
Cads that had known input.
Has not made attempts to contact owners of premises.
Officers unable to assist courts in relation to why statements were not signed on notebooks
profiles.
Another example of doings put in statements to blacken Mr Cordell’s evidence in statement
@ point 12, No convictions that of class A drugs unlike what’s written in Statements -
another example of untrue cut and paste.
DJ
Ill ignore because no convections of class A drugs or supplying is present on the criminal
record.
Counsel
You cannot assist with witness reliability of info contained, can you?
Can Intel be wrongfully inaccurate? No
Officer
604
424,
On that particular re post, it appears to be right.
I did not speak to Parcell he is force @ seven boroughs.
I believe he was not included in the email, because Intel (unreadable text) Email sent to
LDE only.
Searched (unreadable text) for info on Cordell’s convections.
Moving on to statement on Page 30
Does PO investigating unit have more info than it is letting on?
Officer