Page 603 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Si-Information-Part-Edited-01.doc
other landmarks such as A&J cars based in Enfield, I would not have been able to prove my
innocents in the ongoing application leading to an unfair trial.
• Cad
• Cad
• Cad
• Cad
• Cad
in his statements of his facts that are incorrect he led the district Jude into believing the
manufactured and engineered evidence that he had fabricated to aid him to leading the
District Jude to making a guilty verdict.
Please see a copy of the court transcripts as listed below.
Witness 1 - Inspector Hamill -R. O - 11.15am Statement contained in tab 9-lead DEF
XEX
Intel would be by open source, checked by an officer but was not done by me.
The rave was taking place indoors.
I have not personal spoken to the owners of the venue.
I only see the D on the Saturday on the evening of the 7th Saturday. (This was in fact early
th
Hours of the 8 around 1:00am.)
I did not go inside, the gates were closed.
I did not see any vehicles.
D’S Van reg is known to the police but I would not personally know.
There were vehicles parked but I did not notice whether defendants van was there.
He was not aware of people squatting in that building at that time.
(Hearsay of officers continues D @ venue but (unreadable text) Officer (unreadable
text) Not present here today.)
There was a rave on an adjourning RD but not on that day. (Please Take Note Here of
inspector Hamill stating under oath that he was sure all locations were to do with
progress way on this date.)
Phone calls received were not relating to Crown Rd Rave on that day.
On the day in question phone calls related to this particular rave. (Progress Way) Witness -
Pc Elsmore - R.O - 14;10 EIC Tab 6 - pg. ?14?
DEF XEX
Council (unreadable text) curfews (unreadable text) that PNC info on statement adds no
(unreadable text) probatory (unreadable text) value of info re: Witness being “afraid of D”
What he puts down to the way he worded, but he meant that people actually are afraid of
possibly giving evidence in court.
R V CORDELL 4
DEF
Counsel argues that officer’s statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no
value and speculatory in nature.
603
423,
Si-Information-Part-Edited-01.doc
DJ
How many calls from public did police receive?
Witness
In excess of 15 calls - how many to the same venue and not other address.
Doe’s does not know the number of callers that are in relation to each of these occasions.