Page 778 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Thank you for taking your time to do this, however I do have a question to ask, in the
beginning of the court case leading up to the trial, I believed that the justice system would
prove my innocents, but due to the District Judge finding me guilty under the applicants case
of organising illegal raves, that is said to have cause< harm or distress to one or more over
house hold, To which the barrister representing me at the time, having that of the same
opinion about the law as myself, “the should not be illegal if there is no law or regulations to
make it illegal or none that have been breached.”
I was not an organiser as trespass was not present neither have, I broke any conditions in the
licensing act 2003. After the trial, I went home and applied for the a| stage as I knew that this
was wrong, this also made me look into the case even further to notice the time stamps and so
many over errors, My question to you is, “no the errors have been pointed out, how can we
ask the police for more information such as the missing cads and hope that they do not
fabricate more evidence m it so condemning that I would never stand a fair trial under article
six.
(I am scared to ask for more evidence that should prove my innocents, as I believe the police
will make it up, as we can prove happened all ready.)
Please can you explain this to me, before I agree for you to send any think?
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016, 10:11, Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
wrote:
Simon
Can you please review the initial response to the Respondent's application to adduce the
hearsay evidence. I have included some of the points that you take issue with. A full skeleton
legal argument will be served addressing all points you wish raised following our meeting on
Friday morning at 11am subject to you confirming that you can attend. I need a response to
the email which I am proposing on sending over to the court so that our objection to the
hearsay evidence is noted.
Please confirm in writing your specific instructions with regards to the email below and
confirm your authorisation for me to send it, in addition to any amendments that you wish me
to consider including. I need a response to this before 3pm today, 2nd March 2016 please.
Regards
Josephine
Dear Sir or Madam
We refer to the hearsay application dated 23rd February 2016, received in the DX at our
office 1st March 2016.
We require all witnesses to attend as listed on page 5 - 66 to be cross examined.
We confirm that we object to the Respondent's application to adduce hearsay evidence
contained in the CRIMINT reports pages 79 - 92, 109 - 121 of the Respondent bundles.
• CRIMINT - YERT00376728 - Aaron King is required to attend to be cross examined
• CRIMINT -YERT00376227 - PC Chandler is required to attend to be cross examined
• CRIMINT - YERT00376229 - PC Edgoose is required to attend to be cross examined.
• The Appellant also specifically requests disclosure of police checks made on the vehicle he
was driving and the vehicle he was alleged to have been driving bumper to bumper to.
The Appellant also requests specific confirmation in a statement from PC Edgoose the
following: (a) why he was not arrested for any offences in relation to his driving as PC
Edgoose makes specific reference to the driver he was following confirming that the
Appellant had been driving in the same manner from YR. (b) Summons for any road
traffic violations (c) CADS / communications concerning name checks
• CRIMINT -YERT00376024 - PS Skinner is required to attend to be cross examined. The
Appellant seeks specific disclosure as to the vehicle checks carried out on PE52 UHW.
Whether Simon Cordell was ever stopped in this vehicle in the past? Whether Simon