Page 780 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

alleged were in fact "raves" as defined by the legislation. The Metropolitan police published
this in local media to tarnish his reputation.

49.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
49. 1. 2
Asbo Re Simon Cordell’s for mention 02-03-2016 14-14
02/03/2016
/ Page Numbers: 563,564
--
563,
From: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarroUandco.com>
Sent time: 02/03/2016 02:14:25 PM
To: Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell v. The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis for mention on
4th April 2016 at Wood Green Crown Court
Simon
I think it is better if I speak to you tomorrow face to face as may be misinterpreting the
tactical approach that I am taking. The email that I drafted and sent to you for approval has
not been sent to the Respondent just to the Public Defender.
I will see you on Friday at 11am in my office.
Josephine
On 02 March 2016 at 13:49 Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
Thank you for taking your time to do this, however I do have a question to ask, in the
beginning of the court case leading up to the trial, I believed the justice system would prove
my innocents, but due to the District Judge finding me guilty under the applicants case of
organising illegal raves, the is said to have caused alarm harm or distress to one or more over
house hold, To which the barrister representing me at the time, having that of the same
opinion about the law as myself, “that it should not be illegal if there is no law or regulations
to make it illegal or none that have been breached.”
I was not an organiser as trespass was not present neither have, I broke any conditions in the
licensing act 2003. After the trial, I went home and applied for the appeal stage as I knew that
this was wrong, this also made me look into the case even further to notice the time stamps
and so many over errors, My question to you is, “now that the errors have been pointed out,
how can we ask the police for more information such as the missing cat and hope that they do
not fabricate more evidence making it so condemning that I would never stand a fair trial
under article six.
(I am scared to ask for more evidence that should prove my innocents, as I believe the police
will make it up, as we can prove happened all ready.) Please can you explain this to me,
before I agree for you to send any think?
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016, 10:11, Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
wrote:
Simon
Can you please review the initial response to the Respondent's application to adduce the
hearsay evidence. I have included some of the points that you take issue with. A full skeleton
legal argument will be served addressing all points you wish raised following our meeting on
Friday morning at 11am subject to you confirming that you can attend. I need a response to
the email which I am proposing on sending over to the court so that our objection to the
hearsay evidence is noted.